Rule of Law

Senate Democrats Challenge Appointment Of Matt Whitaker, Trump Says He’s OK With Him Blocking Mueller Probe

On Monday, three Democratic U.S. Senators filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of President Donald Trump‘s appointment of Matt Whitaker as acting attorney general.

Sens. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island and Mazie Hirono of Hawaii filed the suit, and are reportedly being represented by two organizations: the Constitutional Accountability Center and Protect Democracy.

Trump named Whitaker to lead the Justice Department after Jeff Sessions resigned on Nov. 7. Whitaker, a former U.S. Attorney in Iowa, is the first acting attorney general in the department’s history who hadn’t been working in a Senate-confirmed role at the time of his appointment. Many prominent Democratic lawmakers have stressed that Whitaker’s appointment to the position of attorney general is unconstitutional unless he is confirmed by the Senate.

Whitaker has already generated controversy because of his previous work at a company that defrauded clients and for heavily defending Trump against special counsel Robert Mueller, to the point of saying he believes he is legally permitted to undermine Mueller’s Russia investigation. Democrats have thus called for Whitaker’s recusal from the inquiry.

Trump reportedly used the Federal Vacancies Reform Act and the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution to name Whitaker as attorney general.

“There are over 160 instances in American history in which non-Senate confirmed persons performed, on a temporary basis, the duties of a Senate-confirmed position,” said Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec. “To suggest otherwise is to ignore centuries of practice and precedent.”

In an interview on Fox News on Sunday, Trump said he would not stop Whitaker should he actively try to limit Mueller’s probe.

“I would not get involved. It’s going to be up to him,” Trump said of Whitaker. “He’s going to do what’s right.”

“He’s a very smart person,” the president added of Whitaker, who once agreed with Trump that the Russia probe could be considered a “witch hunt.” 

Trump recently said he would soon submit his written answers to Mueller’s questions about Russian interference in 2016.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: Skepticism About Trump Administration’s Power Grab at Labor Rights Agencies at D.C. Circuit Argument This Morning

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

J. Doe 4 v. Musk

In J. Doe 4 v. Musk, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland is considering whether Elon Musk’s role in DOGE violates the Appointments Clause and the Constitution’s separation of powers.
Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought

In National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump

In American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally reorganize the federal government are constitutional...