Rule of Law

Senators are suing to get “unconfirmed lackey” Matt Whitaker’s appointment declared unconstitutional

The legal challenges to Matt Whitaker’s recent installment as acting Attorney General just keep piling up, with three Democratic senators formally bringing suit Monday.

Sens. Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) and Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) filed a federal complaint in Washington, D.C., seeking to have Whitaker’s appointment by the president to the top DOJ post declared unconstitutional.

“The stakes are too high to allow the president to install an unconfirmed lackey to lead the Department of Justice — a lackey whose stated purpose, apparently, is undermining a major investigation into the president,” said Whitehouse in a statement. Whitaker served as U.S. Attorney for Iowa from 2004 to 2009, and sat on the board of a Miami-based scam company that hawked patents for everything from time travel technology to hot tubs.

The three senators filed suit with the aid of two nonprofit law firms — Protect Democracy and the Constitutional Accountability Center — joining a growing chorus of lawyers and politicians objecting to the appointment.

Whitaker, a Trump loyalist and vocal skeptic of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the president’s communications with Russia during the 2016 election, previously worked as former attorney General Jeff Sessions’ chief of staff. His appointment following Sessions’ ouster the day after the midterms circumvented the existing Justice Department hierarchy where Rod Rosenstein would have been next in line, blindsiding lawmakers and stoking fears that Trump’s ultimate goal was to dismantle the Mueller probe, which Whitaker now oversees.

Last week, a host of lawyers, including conservative Republicans from the Federalist Society, released statements against Whitaker’s appointment, and lawyers in Maryland asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene.

Under the Vacancies Reform Act, the president can appoint someone to a position that would normally require Senate confirmation, while he or she finds a permanent replacement. By law, Whitaker can serve for up to 210 days as Acting Attorney General – and potentially longer, depending on the confirmation process of his successor. And though his tenure at the helm of the Justice Department will be short-lived, Democrats fear that Whitaker could do significant damage.

And Senators say that another law, the Constitution Appointments Clause, makes it clear that the Senate is required to confirm high-ranking federal government officials including Attorney General, before they start work.

“President Trump is denying Senators our constitutional obligation and opportunity to do our job: scrutinizing the nomination of our nation’s top law enforcement official,” said Blumenthal in a statement. “The reason is simple: Whitaker would never pass the advice and consent test. In selecting a so-called “constitutional nobody” and thwarting every Senator’s constitutional duty, Trump leaves us no choice but to seek recourse through the courts.”

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
January 12, 2026

Sanders Warns Powell Probe Part of Trump Plan to ‘Intimidate and Destroy’ All Critics

Common Dreams
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday warned that the Trump administration’s targeting of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for criminal investigation was part of...
Rule of Law
January 6, 2026

CAC RELEASE: Five Years After the January 6th Attack, We Remember an Assault on Democracy

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon the fifth anniversary of the January 6th attack on the Capitol,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
January 2, 2026

Make 2026 the Year of Thomas Paine

The Nation
As America celebrates its 250th birthday, remember the founder who rallied the people against British...
Rule of Law
December 15, 2025

The Leadership Conference and 257 Other Groups Voice Strong Concerns About House Hearing on the Southern Poverty Law Center

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
December 15, 2025 The Honorable Chip Roy, Chairman The Honorable Mary Gay Scanlon, Ranking Member...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Rise Economy v. Vought

In Rise Economy v. Vought, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to defund the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are lawful.
Rule of Law
December 11, 2025

Not Above the Law Coalition Demands Accountability: Trump’s Illegal National Guard Deployments Threaten Democracy

Common Dreams
WASHINGTON - As the Senate Armed Services Committee holds a hearing on the Trump administration’s deployment...