Sixth Circuit Ignores Supremacy Of U.S. Constitution, Upholds Bans On Marriage Equality In Four States

Washington, DC – On news this afternoon the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld bans on equal access to marriage in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee, the progressive Constitutional Accountability Center – which filed “friend of the court” briefs defending marriage equality at the court together with the libertarian/conservative Cato Institute – issued the following reaction:

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “The majority opinion by Judge Jeffrey Sutton fundamentally misunderstands the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment, barely engaging with the words and meaning of the Constitution.  If he had taken the time to consider the Constitution’s text and history, he would have discovered that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees marriage equality for everyone.”

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David H. Gans continued, “There is no ‘will of the majority’ exception to the Constitution.  Unfortunately, today’s opinion by Judge Sutton creates one, ignoring that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equality under the law to all persons to prevent majorities from discriminating against disfavored minorities.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

Constitutional Accountability Center, joined by the Cato Institute, filed “friend of the court” briefs at the Sixth Circuit in the following cases:

 

DeBoer v. Snyder: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/DeBoer_v_Snyder_MI_CAC_Cato_amicus.pdf 

 

Bourke v. Beshear:  http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Bourke_v_Beshear_CAC_Cato_amicus.pdf 

 

Tanco v. Haslam:  http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Tanco_v_Haslam_TN_CAC_Cato_amicus.pdf 

 

Constitutional Accountability Center, joined by the Cato Institute, filed a “friend of the court” brief in the Fifth Circuit case Robicheaux v. Caldwell, specifically addressing arguments used in today’s Sixth Circuit ruling: 

http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/CAC_amicus_Robicheaux_v_Caldwell.pdf

 

“Faulty Federalism: Constitutional Misconceptions in the Newly Emerging Arguments Against Marriage Equality,” David H. Gans, Constitutional Accountability Center, October 2014: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Issue_Brief-Faulty_Federalism.pdf 

 

“Despite top court, marriage inequality remains,” CAC Vice President Judith E. Schaeffer, USA Today, October 7, 2014: http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/10/07/same-sex-marriage-supreme-court-circuit-courts-column/16830919/ 

 

“Libertarians’ Relationship With Same-Sex Marriage Gets Serious,” Chris Geidner, Buzzfeed, October 24, 2014: http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/libertarians-relationship-with-same-sex-marriage-gets-seriou 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

### 

More from

Immigration and Citizenship
January 21, 2025

Oregon joins growing list of states challenging Trump administration over birthright citizenship

The Oregonian
Oregon on Tuesday joined a growing list of Democratic-led states suing the Trump administration over...
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Boehringer Ingelheim v. Department of Health and Human Services

In Boehringer Ingelheim v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug price negotiation program is an unconstitutional...
Immigration and Citizenship
January 21, 2025

Trump Tried To Rewrite Part Of The Constitution On Day 1. Here’s What You Need To Know.

HuffPost
Can Trump actually end birthright citizenship? Here’s what the laws say.
Rule of Law
January 22, 2025

RELEASE: Justices Appear Poised to Reject Rule that Artificially Shields Police from Accountability

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Barnes v....
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Nebraska v. EPA

In Nebraska v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Immigration and Citizenship
January 21, 2025

States, civil rights groups sue to stop Trump’s birthright citizenship order

Washington Post
Constitutional scholars said the president’s executive order would upend precedent and is unlikely to pass...