Sixth Circuit Ignores Supremacy Of U.S. Constitution, Upholds Bans On Marriage Equality In Four States

Washington, DC – On news this afternoon the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld bans on equal access to marriage in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee, the progressive Constitutional Accountability Center – which filed “friend of the court” briefs defending marriage equality at the court together with the libertarian/conservative Cato Institute – issued the following reaction:

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “The majority opinion by Judge Jeffrey Sutton fundamentally misunderstands the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment, barely engaging with the words and meaning of the Constitution.  If he had taken the time to consider the Constitution’s text and history, he would have discovered that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees marriage equality for everyone.”

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David H. Gans continued, “There is no ‘will of the majority’ exception to the Constitution.  Unfortunately, today’s opinion by Judge Sutton creates one, ignoring that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equality under the law to all persons to prevent majorities from discriminating against disfavored minorities.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

Constitutional Accountability Center, joined by the Cato Institute, filed “friend of the court” briefs at the Sixth Circuit in the following cases:

 

DeBoer v. Snyder: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/DeBoer_v_Snyder_MI_CAC_Cato_amicus.pdf 

 

Bourke v. Beshear:  http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Bourke_v_Beshear_CAC_Cato_amicus.pdf 

 

Tanco v. Haslam:  http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Tanco_v_Haslam_TN_CAC_Cato_amicus.pdf 

 

Constitutional Accountability Center, joined by the Cato Institute, filed a “friend of the court” brief in the Fifth Circuit case Robicheaux v. Caldwell, specifically addressing arguments used in today’s Sixth Circuit ruling: 

http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/CAC_amicus_Robicheaux_v_Caldwell.pdf

 

“Faulty Federalism: Constitutional Misconceptions in the Newly Emerging Arguments Against Marriage Equality,” David H. Gans, Constitutional Accountability Center, October 2014: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Issue_Brief-Faulty_Federalism.pdf 

 

“Despite top court, marriage inequality remains,” CAC Vice President Judith E. Schaeffer, USA Today, October 7, 2014: http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/10/07/same-sex-marriage-supreme-court-circuit-courts-column/16830919/ 

 

“Libertarians’ Relationship With Same-Sex Marriage Gets Serious,” Chris Geidner, Buzzfeed, October 24, 2014: http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/libertarians-relationship-with-same-sex-marriage-gets-seriou 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

### 

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
December 9, 2025

CAC Release: Major Campaign Finance Case Tests Court’s Willingness to Respect Congress’s Policy Judgments Aimed at Curbing Harmful Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in National Republican...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Rule of Law
December 8, 2025

CAC Release: Conservative Justices Neglect History at Oral Argument in Monumental Case about Independent Agencies

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Michelle Berger
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pung v. Isabella County

In Pung v. Isabella County, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is implicated when a local government seizes real property to satisfy a tax debt and then...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Rule of Law
December 9, 2025

Raises Serious Legal Questions: Wydra on Boat Strike

Bloomberg
Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra weighs in on the second strike by the United...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Al Otro Lado v. Trump

In Al Otro Lado v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people from seeking asylum at ports of entry.