Rule of Law

State lawmakers back healthcare mandate

 

The Hill
State lawmakers back healthcare mandate
By Sam Baker
June 6, 2011

 

The legal battle over healthcare reform’s coverage mandate is often portrayed as a battle between states and the federal government. But a group of state legislators says it’s not that simple.

More than 150 state legislators have signed a brief supporting the requirement that most people buy insurance. State attorneys general from 26 states have sued over the policy, saying it’s unconstitutional.

“The benefits of national health care reform for states and their citizens will be substantial, in part because the size of the problem with health care is so great,” the lawmakers’ brief says.

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is scheduled to hear oral arguments in the case this week. The lower court ruled not only that the mandate is unconstitutional, but also that it can’t be separated from the rest of the law.

Opponents of the mandate argue that Congress can regulate the economic activities in which people choose to participate, but can’t mandate that participation. Supporters say the coverage mandate simply regulates how people will pay for the healthcare services that almost everyone will use at some point.

“There is no constitutionally protected right to freeload that is infringed by the individual responsibility aspect of the minimum coverage provision,” the state lawmakers wrote in their brief.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Federal judge dismisses Trump classified documents criminal case

Kansas Reflector
MILWAUKEE — The federal classified documents case against former President Donald Trump was dismissed Monday...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Ashley Murray