Rule of Law

State lawmakers to defend health law in SCOTUS case

(text from the daily digest provided by Herndon Alliance)

 

by Jennifer Haberkorn

 

Nearly 500 hundred liberal state legislators plan to file a brief with the Supreme Court on Thursday in support of the healthcare law’s individual mandate. But in case you can’t wait to hear what they have to say about it, they’re already out with the release and the summary today. The Working Group of State Legislators for Health Reform and the Constitutional Accountability Center argue that Congress has the constitutional authority to solve national problems through national solutions. “The general purpose of the Affordable Care Act falls within Congress’s constitutionally granted powers, and the minimum coverage provision, which is part of the means of effecting reform of the national health care industry, does not infringe upon any constitutionally guaranteed rights,” the groups wrote in a summary released Wednesday. “There is no constitutional right to freeload that is infringed by the individual responsibility aspect of the minimum coverage provision.” Dozens of groups plan to weigh in on the Supreme Court’s deliberations on the health lawsuit through amicus briefs. Oral arguments in the case are slated for late March. “This is a massive show of support for this law from state legislators across the country,” said Washington state Sen. Karen Keiser, chairwoman of the Working Group of State Legislators for Health Reform.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Nebraska v. EPA

In Nebraska v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Rule of Law
January 20, 2025

RELEASE: Trump’s Shameful Pardons and Commutations Cannot Change the Facts of January 6th

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon reports that President Donald Trump has issued pardons and commutations for individuals...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

C-SPAN
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
Rule of Law
January 14, 2025

Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

Newsweek
With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

CAC (Bloomberg): CAC’s Wydra Joins Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to Discuss TikTok Supreme Court Case

Bloomberg TV