State legislative group lends backing to health care law

 

Though a lawsuit filed by state attorneys general over the Obama administration’s new health care law is receiving the lion’s share of media attention, a bipartisan group of state lawmakers also wants its voice heard in the court battle — in support of the controversial legislation.

Seventy-one legislators from 26 states have asked for permission to file a legal brief in support of the health care law, according to The Hill, a congressional newspaper in Washington, D.C. The group includes representatives from a dozen states where the governor or the attorney general is already formally lined up against the law.

“Given the Plaintiffs’ emphasis on state sovereignty,” the legislators’ motion says, “the views of State Legislators should not be excluded, particularly since the Plaintiffs purport to represent the interests of state sovereigns in general — when, in fact, many States and their citizens do not agree with Plaintiffs’ view of the Act and, specifically, the expansion of Medicaid.”

The lawmakers’ legal effort is led by Jack Hatch, a state senator in Iowa and the chair of the Working Group of State Legislators for Health Reform. It is also backed by the Progressive States Network, a nonprofit that supports liberal-leaning legislation in the states, and the Constitutional Accountability Center, a progressive think tank and public interest law firm.

As The Hill notes, many public officials, experts and affected organizations are lining up on each side of the new health care law, including by filing briefs in court. Leading hospital organizations want to file a brief in support of the law, for example, while several incoming Republican governors have already indicated an inclination to move against it. 

 
To read this story online, click here.

 

More from

Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Cases Implicating Constitution’s Fundamental Guarantee of Equality for all Persons

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral arguments at the Supreme Court this morning in Little v....
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, Praveen Fernandes, David H. Gans
Rule of Law
January 12, 2026

Sanders Warns Powell Probe Part of Trump Plan to ‘Intimidate and Destroy’ All Critics

Common Dreams
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday warned that the Trump administration’s targeting of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for criminal investigation was part of...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft

In Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, the Sixth Circuit is considering the legality of a Trump Administration policy that requires imprisoning all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Sanchez Alvarez v. Raycraft

In Sanchez Alvarez v. Raycraft, the Sixth Circuit is considering the legality of a Trump Administration policy that requires imprisoning all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Pizarro Reyes v. Raycraft

In Pizarro Reyes v. Raycraft, the Sixth Circuit is considering the legality of a Trump Administration policy that requires imprisoning all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

California v. Trump

In California v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is considering whether President Trump’s executive order on voting is unlawful.