Statement of Doug Kendall, President, Constitutional Accountability Center, on Supreme Court’s Ruling in Voting Rights Act Case (NAMUDNO)

“The Supreme Court backed one step away from a very steep cliff today when it avoided a constitutional challenge to a central part of the Voting Rights Act (VRA).   However, the Court remained close to the edge, wrongly opining that the VRA raises ‘serious constitutional questions,’ setting up a future challenge to the Act.   In fact, as Constitutional Accountability Center lays out in a brief in NAMUDNO and in our new report, The Shield of National Protection, the text and history of the Civil War Amendments give Congress broad power to secure liberty, equality and the right to vote, and the Court in prior cases has gotten this text and history dead wrong in limiting congressional power in these areas.  Hopefully, in a subsequent case, the Court will finally get this text and history right.”

* * **

Constitutional  Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org)  is a think tank, law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.  Our amicus brief in NAMUDNO and our new report, The Shield of National Protection: The Text and History of Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment,  are available, respectively, here and here

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

New York v. Trump

In New York v. Trump, the First Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral and categorical decision to freeze all federal funding to programs that do not align with its policy priorities violates federal...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Martin v. United States

In Martin v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Supremacy Clause overrides the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)’s express waiver of sovereign immunity when a federal employee’s actions “have some nexus with...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Pacito v. Trump

In Pacito v. Trump, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to dismantle the United States Refugee Assistance Program (USRAP), including by suspending all USRAP funding, violates federal law and the...
Rule of Law
March 13, 2025

March 2025 Newsletter: Ongoing Challenges and New Victories

Rule of Law
March 7, 2025

TV (Bloomberg): Could Trump Saying Musk Heads DOGE Create Legal Issue?

Bloomberg TV
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Catholic Charities Fort Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services

In Catholic Charities Forth Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to freeze funding appropriated for...