Statement of Doug Kendall, President, Constitutional Accountability Center on the Hamilton Filibuster Attempt

November 17, 2009

It is outrageous that it has taken the Senate 8 months to clear the way to a vote on David Hamilton.  In any normal world, a nominee like Judge Hamilton – with the highest possible ABA rating, and the support of the most senior Republican in the Senate and of the President of the Indiana Federalist Society – would be approved quickly and unanimously.  

After years of promising that they would never filibuster a judicial nominee and claiming that it is unconstitutional to do so, 29 Republicans have turned around and led a filibuster against President Obama’s first judicial nominee, David Hamilton.  These Republicans have asserted that extraordinary circumstances justify this hypocrisy, but the only extraordinary things about Judge Hamilton are his credentials and his bipartisan support in Indiana.  Constitutional Accountability Center hails the 70 Senators of both parties who rejected this attempt to escalate the judicial confirmation wars.  
 

More from

Environmental Protection
December 10, 2024

RELEASE: Some Justices Seem Skeptical of Most Extreme Arguments Seeking to Limit the Scope of the National Environmental Policy Act

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Seven County...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Gutierrez v. Saenz

In Gutierrez v. Saenz, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal court, as part of its analysis of a Section 1983 plaintiff’s standing to pursue a procedural due process claim against state officials, must...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Kentucky v. EPA

In Kentucky v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Smith

In United States v. Smith, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether the Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement officers—without a warrant or probable cause—to search and copy the contents...
Rule of Law
December 5, 2024

Alarm raised over Trump plot to install nominees without Senate approval

AlterNet
Dozens of civil rights and pro-democracy organizations teamed up Wednesday to express opposition to President-elect...