Statement of Doug Kendall, President, Constitutional Accountability Center on the Hamilton Filibuster Attempt

November 17, 2009

It is outrageous that it has taken the Senate 8 months to clear the way to a vote on David Hamilton.  In any normal world, a nominee like Judge Hamilton – with the highest possible ABA rating, and the support of the most senior Republican in the Senate and of the President of the Indiana Federalist Society – would be approved quickly and unanimously.  

After years of promising that they would never filibuster a judicial nominee and claiming that it is unconstitutional to do so, 29 Republicans have turned around and led a filibuster against President Obama’s first judicial nominee, David Hamilton.  These Republicans have asserted that extraordinary circumstances justify this hypocrisy, but the only extraordinary things about Judge Hamilton are his credentials and his bipartisan support in Indiana.  Constitutional Accountability Center hails the 70 Senators of both parties who rejected this attempt to escalate the judicial confirmation wars.  
 

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...