Immigration and Citizenship

Supreme Court Asked To Review The President’s Immigration Actions In The Current Term

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Department of Justice filed for certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court to seek resolution of a dispute over President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents program (DAPA), Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction:

 

“The government’s decision to seek Supreme Court review of President Obama’s immigration action is welcome,” said CAC Appellate Counsel Brianne Gorod, a former clerk to Justice Stephen Breyer. “The Court can easily hear this case in the current Term, which is important given both the case’s significance and the fact that the lower courts have blocked the President’s action from going into effect. In fact, given the Court’s normal procedures, it would risk the appearance of engaging in politics if the Court didn’t hear the case this Term.”

 

“The Fifth Circuit dragged its heels,” said CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra, “but the Supreme Court clearly has time to hear the case this Term and we look forward to seeing this critical question resolved by June.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief on behalf of a bipartisan group of former members of Congress, including Ray LaHood, Jim Leach, and Henry Waxman: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/texas-v-united-states-5th-cir 

 

“Time for the Fifth Circuit to rule,” Brianne Gorod, The Hill, October 21, 2015: http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/257487-time-for-the-fifth-circuit-to-rule 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 27, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...