Immigration and Citizenship

Supreme Court Asked To Review The President’s Immigration Actions In The Current Term

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Department of Justice filed for certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court to seek resolution of a dispute over President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents program (DAPA), Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction:

 

“The government’s decision to seek Supreme Court review of President Obama’s immigration action is welcome,” said CAC Appellate Counsel Brianne Gorod, a former clerk to Justice Stephen Breyer. “The Court can easily hear this case in the current Term, which is important given both the case’s significance and the fact that the lower courts have blocked the President’s action from going into effect. In fact, given the Court’s normal procedures, it would risk the appearance of engaging in politics if the Court didn’t hear the case this Term.”

 

“The Fifth Circuit dragged its heels,” said CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra, “but the Supreme Court clearly has time to hear the case this Term and we look forward to seeing this critical question resolved by June.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief on behalf of a bipartisan group of former members of Congress, including Ray LaHood, Jim Leach, and Henry Waxman: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/texas-v-united-states-5th-cir 

 

“Time for the Fifth Circuit to rule,” Brianne Gorod, The Hill, October 21, 2015: http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/257487-time-for-the-fifth-circuit-to-rule 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...
Rule of Law
July 10, 2026

July Newsletter: The Legacy of the Declaration of Independence Belongs to We the People

Federal Courts and Nominations
July 9, 2026

Leadership Conference Sign-on Letter Opposing Confirmation of Todd Blanche

Reject the Confirmation of Todd Blanche as U.S. Attorney General    The Honorable Chuck Grassley,...