Access to Justice

Supreme Court Closes Courthouse Door To Important Medicaid Lawsuits

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a divided ruling in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc., Constitutional Accountability Center released the following reaction:

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans said, “Make no mistake, the practical effects of this ruling are enormous for ordinary Americans. The Court today turned its back on the principle of access to our federal courts, leaving low income people seeking access to health care to the vagaries and limitations of the executive branch.”

 

CAC Appellate Counsel Brianne Gorod continued, “Unfortunately, this case is just the latest in a long line of Roberts Court cases that bend over backwards to allow corporations to enforce federal rights, while closing the courthouse doors to ordinary Americans and minorities seeking to enforce theirs. That said, one silver lining of today’s decision is that all members of the Court recognized that there is a long history of the right to go to federal court to redress unlawful state action. Hopefully at least some members of the Court will remember that history and strike the balance in favor of court access in future rulings.”

 

#

 

Additional Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc.: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Armstrong_v_Exceptional_Child_Center_14-15_CAC_Amicus.pdf

 

“Can Plaintiffs Be Denied Their Day in Court Because a Remedy is Costly?: The Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc.,” David H. Gans, January 22, 2015: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/3068/can-plaintiffs-be-denied-their-day-court-because-remedy-costly-supreme-court-hears 

 

Roberts at 10: Roberts’s Consistent Votes to Close the Courthouse Doors, Brianne Gorod: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts-at-10-Access-to-the-Courts.pdf 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Access to Justice

Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought

In National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump

In American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally reorganize the federal government are constitutional...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Center for International Labor Solidarity v. Chavez-Deremer

In American Center for International Labor Solidarity v. Chavez-Deremer, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to terminate en masse all of the Department...
Rule of Law
April 28, 2025

Trump’s first 100 days offer blueprint for future presidents to evade Congress

Roll Call
ANALYSIS — As he marks the first 100 days of his second term, President Donald...
Rule of Law
May 1, 2025

Bondi’s Firing of DOJ Lawyer for Lack of ‘Zealous Advocacy’ in Deportation Case Raises Concerns

Law.com
A leading legal ethics scholar warned that the U.S. attorney general’s action may “intimidate DOJ...