Access to Justice

Supreme Court Decision A Victory for the Constitution and For Millions Who Rely On Medicaid

Washington, DC – On news this morning of the Supreme Court’s decision in Wos v. EMA (formerly Delia v. EMA), holding that a North Carolina statute is preempted by the federal Medicaid law, the Director of Constitutional Accountability Center’s Access to Courts program, Rochelle Bobroff, released the following statement:

 

“Today’s majority opinion is a huge victory for the 62 million Americans – one out of every five – who depend on Medicaid for access to health care. This ruling makes clear that the Medicaid statute is as much a part of the Federal Code as any other, and displaces state laws that conflict with the program.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

*  CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Delia (Wos) v. EMA, together with AARP in support of Respondent, identified by the Court as E.M.A., “a child who was born with multiple serious birth injuries”: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/delia-Amicus-Brief-AARP-CAC.pdf 

 

*  “A Lurking Threat to Federal Spending Clause Programs,” Rochelle Bobroff, January 3, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1757/lurking-threat-federal-spending-clause-programs 

 

*  “The Medicaid Program at a Glance,” Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, March 2013: http://www.kff.org/medicaid/upload/7235-06.pd

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Access to Justice

Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 23, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

State of Washington v. Trump

In State of Washington v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least...