Corporate Accountability

Supreme Court Hands Coal Industry, Chamber A Victory

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Michigan v. EPA, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following reaction:

 

CAC Counsel Tom Donnelly said, “For the first time ever, the Court requires the EPA to consider compliance costs for industry without any mention by Congress of such a requirement. As Justice Kagan wrote in her dissent, ‘That is a peculiarly blinkered way for a court to assess the lawfulness of an agency’s rulemaking.’”

 

CAC President Doug Kendall continued, “Industry has managed to turn a provision designed to study the health effects of power plant regulation into delay that has lasted 25 years and counting with, according to the EPA, thousands of lives lost each year as a result. The effect of today’s ruling could be to kick the can years further down the road.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s case page, including link to our “friend of the court” brief, in Michigan v. EPA: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/michigan-v-epa-us-sup-ct 

 

“4 reasons why the Supreme Court’s mercury case is worth watching,” Tom Donnelly, Grist, Monday, March 23, 2015: http://grist.org/climate-energy/4-reasons-why-the-supreme-courts-mercury-case-is-worth-watching/ 

 

Roberts at 10: Roberts’s Environmental Law Record: It’s Not Good, But Don’t Count Him Out, Brianne Gorod: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts-at-10-Environment.pdf 

 

UPDATE: “Another Solid Term for Big Business at the Roberts Court,” Tom Donnelly, June 30, 2015: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/3340/another-solid-term-big-business-roberts-court

 

###

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
 

Intuit, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

In Intuit Inc v. Federal Trade Commission, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the FTC’s authority to issue cease-and-desist orders against false and misleading advertising is constitutional.
Rule of Law
June 20, 2024

Opinion | The tragedy of the Supreme Court’s bump stock ruling

Washington Post
Don’t let technicalities, or a refusal to use common sense, become the enemy of public...
By: Nina Henry
Access to Justice
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court rejects artificial limit on liability for speech-based retaliation by government officers

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s Supreme Court decision in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case in...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: In narrow ruling, Supreme Court rejects baseless effort to shield corporate-derived income from taxation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Moore v. United...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
June 19, 2024

The Supreme Court’s approach on ‘history and tradition’ is irking Amy Coney Barrett

CNN
Washington (CNN) — On a Supreme Court where the conservative supermajority increasingly leans on history as a...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Devan Cole, John Fritze