Supreme Court Rejects Yet Another Challenge to Obamacare

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Sissel v. HHS, the latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act, Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction:

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “It is hardly surprising that the Court has refused to hear this case. As I testified before a Committee of the House of Representatives last week, the ultimate outcome of challenges like this one aren’t in doubt. They are simply meritless. The Court upheld the ACA for the second time just last June, with Chief Justice Roberts picking up a sixth vote to send a clear signal that he’s had enough of what has become a blatant ideological crusade. One questions whether anti-Obamacare legal activists have gotten the message.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra’s testimony before U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice regarding challenges to the Affordable Care Act based on the Origination Clause of the Constitution, including Sissel v. HHS, January 13, 2015: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7C5Mbo0YrsU 

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief in Hotze v. Burwell (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit), on behalf of Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, then-Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and Representative Sandy Levin of Michigan, Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee, explaining that the ACA satisfies the requirements of the Origination Clause: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/hotze-v-burwell 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from

Criminal Law
January 14, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Ignores History in Favor of Its Own Rule for Warrantless Home Entries

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Case v. Montana, a...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Access to Justice
January 14, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Justices Pose Difficult Questions to State-Affiliated Corporation that Claims Immunity from Suit

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Galette v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Harith Khawaja
Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Cases Implicating Constitution’s Fundamental Guarantee of Equality for all Persons

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral arguments at the Supreme Court this morning in Little v....
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, Praveen Fernandes, David H. Gans
Rule of Law
January 12, 2026

Sanders Warns Powell Probe Part of Trump Plan to ‘Intimidate and Destroy’ All Critics

Common Dreams
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday warned that the Trump administration’s targeting of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for criminal investigation was part of...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft

In Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, the Sixth Circuit is considering the legality of a Trump Administration policy that requires imprisoning all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Sanchez Alvarez v. Raycraft

In Sanchez Alvarez v. Raycraft, the Sixth Circuit is considering the legality of a Trump Administration policy that requires imprisoning all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.