Civil and Human Rights

Supreme Court: Victory For Fair Housing, MLK Legacy

SUPREME COURT PLAZA, Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction:

 

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “At a time when racial tension is flaring throughout this country, the Court decided to uphold rather than hollow out one of the Nation’s foundational civil rights statutes, the Fair Housing Act, which was passed in 1968 to honor the legacy of the recently assassinated Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.” 

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans continued, “By a 5-4 vote, the Court held that federal housing laws, like the nation’s other civil rights laws, allow plaintiffs to go to court to challenge state and federal policies that result in a denial of equal opportunity. In the wake of recent events in Ferguson, Baltimore, and Charleston, Justice Kennedy’s ruling affirms Congress’s ability to address the lingering effects of slavery and Jim Crow segregation.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Texas_Dept_of_Housing_v_Inclusive_Communities_Project_CAC_Merits_Amicus.pdf

 

CAC Roberts at 10 Snapshot, David Gans: Turning Back the Clock on Protections for Racial Equality: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts_at_10-Race_snapshot.pdf

 

“Will the Supreme Court Honor Dr. King’s Legacy?” Elizabeth B. Wydra, Huffington Post, January 21, 2015: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-b-wydra/will-the-supreme-court-ho_b_6509100.html 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes