Civil and Human Rights

Supreme Court: Victory For Fair Housing, MLK Legacy

SUPREME COURT PLAZA, Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction:

 

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “At a time when racial tension is flaring throughout this country, the Court decided to uphold rather than hollow out one of the Nation’s foundational civil rights statutes, the Fair Housing Act, which was passed in 1968 to honor the legacy of the recently assassinated Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.” 

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans continued, “By a 5-4 vote, the Court held that federal housing laws, like the nation’s other civil rights laws, allow plaintiffs to go to court to challenge state and federal policies that result in a denial of equal opportunity. In the wake of recent events in Ferguson, Baltimore, and Charleston, Justice Kennedy’s ruling affirms Congress’s ability to address the lingering effects of slavery and Jim Crow segregation.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Texas_Dept_of_Housing_v_Inclusive_Communities_Project_CAC_Merits_Amicus.pdf

 

CAC Roberts at 10 Snapshot, David Gans: Turning Back the Clock on Protections for Racial Equality: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts_at_10-Race_snapshot.pdf

 

“Will the Supreme Court Honor Dr. King’s Legacy?” Elizabeth B. Wydra, Huffington Post, January 21, 2015: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-b-wydra/will-the-supreme-court-ho_b_6509100.html 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 26, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...