Access to Justice

Supreme Court: Victory in Battle Against Housing Discrimination

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Bank of America Corp. v. City of Miami, Constitutional Accountability Center – which filed a brief in the case in support of the City of Miami – issued the following reaction: 

“This an important ruling that reaffirms the promise of access to the courts to remedy housing discrimination that all too often plagues our cities,” said CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans. “The Court reaffirms that cities can play an important role in enforcing the Fair Housing Act’s promise of equality by holding corporations to account for policies that perpetuate racial segregation.”

“In arriving at its decision, the Court today properly respected its own precedents, as well as Congress’s ratification of those precedents,” added CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod. “While the most significant aspect of today’s decision was its recognition of the role that cities can play in enforcing the Fair Housing Act, perhaps the most unexpected aspect was the vote of Chief Justice John Roberts. While he clearly remains a conservative Justice, today’s ruling is yet another reminder that he is a conservative who occasionally surprises.”

#

Resources:

CAC “friend of the court” brief in Bank of America Corp. v. City of Miami and Wells Fargo & Co. v. City of Miami: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/bank-america-corp-v-city-miami-and-wells-fargo-co-v-city-miami-us-sup-ct

CAC Issue Brief series on the first ten Terms of Chief Justice John Roberts, Roberts at 10: http://theusconstitution.org/think-tank/issue-brief/roberts-10 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Access to Justice

Environmental Protection
December 10, 2024

RELEASE: Some Justices Seem Skeptical of Most Extreme Arguments Seeking to Limit the Scope of the National Environmental Policy Act

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Seven County...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Gutierrez v. Saenz

In Gutierrez v. Saenz, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal court, as part of its analysis of a Section 1983 plaintiff’s standing to pursue a procedural due process claim against state officials, must...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Kentucky v. EPA

In Kentucky v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Smith

In United States v. Smith, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether the Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement officers—without a warrant or probable cause—to search and copy the contents...
Rule of Law
December 5, 2024

Alarm raised over Trump plot to install nominees without Senate approval

AlterNet
Dozens of civil rights and pro-democracy organizations teamed up Wednesday to express opposition to President-elect...