Rule of Law

The Constitution in a Modern Context

Constitutionalism is a great idea, but it’s not a new one to Charles Krauthammer [“Constitutionalism,” op-ed, Jan. 7] or House Republicans. Rather, it is the genius of framers such as James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, and “We the People,” who established a constitutional republic more than 220 years ago.

Mr. Krauthammer’s attempt to claim the Constitution as his own is an offensive, if standard, trope of conservatives. But the difference between constitutional progressives and constitutional conservatives is not about whether to follow the Constitution, but about what the Constitution requires and allows, particularly when it comes to the powers of the federal government.

In that regard, the best moment of the reading of the Constitution on the House floor last week came when Tea Party firebrand Rep. Allen B. West (R-Fla.) was forced to read the Constitution’s “necessary and proper” clause, known by the framers as the “sweeping clause” for the powers it granted to the national government. Hopefully, after reading the document out loud, Mr. West and his fellow conservatives should have a better idea of what constitutionalism is all about.

Doug Kendall, Washington

The writer is president of the Constitutional Accountability Center.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
September 5, 2024

Reflections on my Kendall Fellowship

On my first day at the Constitutional Accountability Center, I worked on a brief about...
By: Jess Zalph
Rule of Law
September 2, 2024

Transgender rights, ghost guns, porn ID cases on Supreme Court docket; stakes high in next term

The Washington Times
The Supreme Court is still on its three-month summer recess but already has loaded its docket with...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, Alex Swoyer
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Iowa v. SEC

In Iowa v. SEC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is considering the legality of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s new climate-related disclosure requirements.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB

In Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering the legality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s update to its Examination Manual clarifying that discrimination may...
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Lackey v. Stinnie

In Lackey v. Stinnie, the Supreme Court is considering when a civil rights plaintiff is entitled to attorney’s fees as the “prevailing party” in a case.
Rule of Law
August 6, 2024

Another Summer Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four incredible interns who all contributed to our work promoting the...
By: Zach Brown, Harith Khawaja, Indu Pandey, Alex Siegal