Corporate Accountability

Tie Vote In Major Labor Case Underscores Need For Full Supreme Court

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court divided evenly 4-4 in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, a major labor case over the issue of public sector unions and fair-share fees, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

 

“This is an important case, and while we argued that the ruling of the court below should be affirmed, as it now has been, today’s divided ruling from the Supreme Court establishes no national precedent while leaving open the possibility that the issue will come before the Court once again. Such an outcome only emphasizes the importance of a Court that can operate with a full complement of nine justices that can resolve important legal questions from lower courts once and for all.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association on behalf of 48 current and former Republican members of state legislatures and Congress in support of the teachers:  http://theusconstitution.org/cases/friedrichs-v-california-teachers-association-us-sup-ct 

 

“GOP not entirely united on Friedrichs case,” Illinois News Networks, Wednesday, December 2, 2015: http://www.mysuburbanlife.com/2015/12/01/gop-not-entirely-united-on-friedrichs-case/a49h4q9/ 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Corporate Accountability

Access to Justice
April 20, 2026

CAC Release: Court Considers Whether to Expand or Restrict Authority of Federal Courts to Collaterally Review State Court Judgments

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in T.M. v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Michelle Berger
Rule of Law
April 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Considers Whether Investor Harm Is a Prerequisite to an Award of Disgorgement in a Civil Action Brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s oral argument at the Supreme Court in Sripetch v. Securities...
By: Simon Chin
Voting Rights and Democracy
April 15, 2026

David Gans on the History of the Reconstruction Amendments, and the Connection to Current Supreme Court Cases, including Callais

Election Law Blog
CAC Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David Gans' article in Slate about...
Access to Justice
April 14, 2026

Doctors Hope Justices Maintain Shield Against Med Mal Suits

CAC Kendall Fellow Michelle Berger discussed CAC's amicus brief in T.M. v. University of Maryland with Law360....
Civil and Human Rights
April 15, 2026

The Supreme Court Has a Chance to Revolutionize Its Approach to the Law

Slate
CAC Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David Gans wrote about...
By: David H. Gans
Rule of Law
April 15, 2026

Court to contemplate SEC’s use of disgorgement in securities enforcement

SCOTUSBlog
CAC's amici brief on behalf of legal scholars in Sripetch v. SEC was featured in SCOTUSblog. Read more...