Rule of Law

Trump Administration Looks To Defy Tax Disclosure Law

It will be up to courts to force the administration to comply with the law and allow the president’s tax returns to be released to Congress.

Donald Trump’s administration is not abiding Democratic requests for Trump’s tax returns under a federal tax disclosure law that gives Congress the power to request copies of anyone’s tax information.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said his department would provide a final answer by May 6 but strongly suggested that answer will be no.

The Treasury Department will consult with the Justice Department on the Democratic request because of “the serious constitutional questions raised by this request and the serious consequences that a resolution of those questions could have for taxpayer privacy,” Mnuchin said in a letter Tuesday to House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-Mass.).

Congressional committees that create tax policy are supposed to be allowed to look at anyone’s tax returns thanks to a 1924 law enacted as a check on corruption in the executive branch of government. Neal gave the administration until 5 p.m. Tuesday to comply.

The law gives no leeway for refusal, meaning the administration will probably wind up explaining its position to a federal judge. Neal said Tuesday he would consult with the committee’s lawyers about his next steps.

Committee member Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) said Mnuchin is breaking the law. “This administration’s contempt for rule of law is without peer,” he said.

Democrats have said all along they’ll fight the Trump administration in court. That means they’ll likely issue a subpoena for the documents they requested, which the Trump administration will ignore as part of its overall strategy of stonewalling congressional investigations. And then Democrats can sue to ask a judge to enforce the subpoena.

In an interview with The Washington Post, Trump said Tuesday evening that he is opposed to current and former White House aides providing testimony to congressional panels in the wake of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report. In addition to the Treasury’s defiance toward the House Ways and Means Committee, the White House plans to fight a subpoena from the House Judiciary Committee and a separate subpoena from the House Oversight Committee, potentially by using executive privilege.

Legal scholars have said no administration has ever refused a tax return request, but plenty of administrations have tried to fight subpoenas ― and they’ve often lost. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that because the Constitution gives Congress the power to legislate, it gives the power to investigate, since lawmakers need good information about the laws they might want to change.

Both the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations fought losing battles against congressional subpoenas, but the Congressional Research Service has noted that they were able to drag out the proceedings until a new Congress was elected.

But the tax return fight wouldn’t need to last through November 2020, according to Brianne Gorod of the Constitutional Accountability Center, a progressive nonprofit that often files “friend of the court” briefs in Supreme Court cases. 

“The court process doesn’t need to take that long because there are a couple of things Congress can do to speed up the process,” said Gorod, a former attorney-adviser in the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice. “It can sue expeditiously, and it can ask the court to expedite the proceedings.”

Neal originally requested six years of Trump’s personal and business returns on April 3, saying Congress needs to know more about the scope of mandatory audits of the president that the IRS does every year. He sent a follow-up request on April 13 after Mnuchin stalled.

Mnuchin claimed Neal’s request is an abuse of power that could jeopardize tax return privacy for all Americans. Obtaining the tax returns is not the same as making them public, however, and Democrats have said they’ll be careful about what they publicly release.

Trump is the first president in 40 years not to disclose a single year of tax information, a standard practice for presidents and candidates because it reveals details about their income, their charitable giving and how much tax they pay.

The IRS routinely discloses private tax information to Congress, and Republicans have used the law several times in recent years during high-profile investigations, but Neal’s letter is the first time Congress has asked for a president’s returns.

Mnuchin said Neal’s request “is the culmination of a long-running, well-documented effort to expose the President’s tax returns for the sake of exposure.”

Though Mnuchin has said the administration’s opposition to Neal’s request is founded in high-minded constitutional concerns, the president himself has repeatedly said he can’t release tax information because he’s under audit. The IRS itself has said repeatedly that being under audit doesn’t preclude anyone from disclosing their own tax return, as every president since Nixon has done.

“Once he’s out of audit, he’ll think about doing it. But he’s not inclined to do so at this time,” White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said Tuesday on Fox News, claiming the issue had been “litigated in 2016.”

As a candidate, Trump initially said he would release his tax returns, but in 2016, he started saying he would only do so after the audit wrapped up.

Most Americans say Trump should release the documents and that Democrats should try to get them, according to recent surveys.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought

In National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump

In American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally reorganize the federal government are constitutional...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Center for International Labor Solidarity v. Chavez-Deremer

In American Center for International Labor Solidarity v. Chavez-Deremer, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to terminate en masse all of the Department...
Rule of Law
April 28, 2025

Trump’s first 100 days offer blueprint for future presidents to evade Congress

Roll Call
ANALYSIS — As he marks the first 100 days of his second term, President Donald...
Rule of Law
May 1, 2025

Bondi’s Firing of DOJ Lawyer for Lack of ‘Zealous Advocacy’ in Deportation Case Raises Concerns

Law.com
A leading legal ethics scholar warned that the U.S. attorney general’s action may “intimidate DOJ...