Rule of Law

Trump’s current term cannot be extended by three years

“This is absolutely, 100 percent wrong. The Supreme Court cannot in any way, under any circumstances or for any reason, grant any president any sort of ‘extension’ of their term in office.” — CAC President Elizabeth Wydra

Facebook posts shared more than 4,000 times link to an article stating that President Donald Trump’s current term could be extended by three years, with some users apparently taking it as fact. The claim is false; the article is labeled satire, and legal experts say it cannot happen.

The article — linked to in posts here and here — is headlined: “Supreme Court Can Extend Trump’s Term By Up To 3 Years If He’s Acquitted In The Senate.”

“Is this possible?” one of the posts on a pro-Trump Facebook page says.

A screenshot taken on February 4, 2020

Comments on the post indicate that some readers believe it is in fact possible, though others identified the article as satire.

“Now this is great news!” wrote one person, while another commented: “Fabulous. I would be happy if he remained President indefinitely.”

A screenshot taken on February 4, 2020

The article says that if Trump is acquitted by the Senate — where he is currently on trial on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — his term could be extended until 2023 unless the top US court struck down a 1970s-era law allowing this to happen.

It was published on dailyworldupdate.us, a website whose banner says the site provides “Satire for Flat Earthers, Trumpsters, and Y’all Qaeda.”

A screenshot taken on February 4, 2020

Dailyworldupdate.us is part of the “America’s Last Line of Defense” network of websites, which was founded by Christopher Blair, a resident of the US state of Maine.

Articles on Blair’s sites make outrageous claims written as fact, albeit with clear indications they are not real.

The articles are nonetheless shared in droves by people who apparently believe they are true amid a hyper-partisan American political environment.

Legal experts also told AFP by email that Trump’s current term cannot be extended.

“This is absolutely, 100 percent wrong. The Supreme Court cannot in any way, under any circumstances or for any reason, grant any president any sort of ‘extension’ of their term in office,” said Elizabeth Wydra, the president of the Constitutional Accountability Center.

It “is categorically untrue and there is no basis in the text or interpretive history of the Constitution to support that claim,” said Fernando Laguarda, Director of the Program on Law & Government at American University’s Washington College of Law.

The US president has repeatedly joked about remaining in office past the constitutionally-mandated two-term limit during campaign rallies and official speeches, as well as on Twitter.

A screenshot taken on February 4, 2020

Claims that Trump’s acquittal by the Senate would nullify his first term and allow him to serve two more have also circulated online in recent months, including here and here.

But legal experts said the only way Trump could stand for more than two terms would be through an amendment to the Constitution.

“The Constitution forbids any person to be elected more than twice to the office of president. Frankly, it’s deeply worrisome that some Trump supporters are even contemplating such an unconstitutional, anti-democratic, un-American idea,” Wydra said.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
January 12, 2026

Sanders Warns Powell Probe Part of Trump Plan to ‘Intimidate and Destroy’ All Critics

Common Dreams
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday warned that the Trump administration’s targeting of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for criminal investigation was part of...
Rule of Law
January 6, 2026

CAC RELEASE: Five Years After the January 6th Attack, We Remember an Assault on Democracy

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon the fifth anniversary of the January 6th attack on the Capitol,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
January 2, 2026

Make 2026 the Year of Thomas Paine

The Nation
As America celebrates its 250th birthday, remember the founder who rallied the people against British...
Rule of Law
December 15, 2025

The Leadership Conference and 257 Other Groups Voice Strong Concerns About House Hearing on the Southern Poverty Law Center

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
December 15, 2025 The Honorable Chip Roy, Chairman The Honorable Mary Gay Scanlon, Ranking Member...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Rise Economy v. Vought

In Rise Economy v. Vought, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to defund the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are lawful.
Rule of Law
December 11, 2025

Not Above the Law Coalition Demands Accountability: Trump’s Illegal National Guard Deployments Threaten Democracy

Common Dreams
WASHINGTON - As the Senate Armed Services Committee holds a hearing on the Trump administration’s deployment...