Federal Courts and Nominations

TV (FOX): Justice Gorsuch spends his first day on the Supreme Court

 

As Associate Judge Neil Gorsuch took his seat for the first time on the far right side of the bench, Chief Justice Roberts welcomed him, wishing him “a long and happy career in our common calling.”

 

Admirers of the deceased Justice Antonin Scalia, who was known for his disdain of legislating from the bench, might have enjoyed what followed.

In oral arguments over which court should hear former fired census taker Anthony W. Perry’s discrimination lawsuit, Gorsuch vigorously engaged opposing lawyers for 10 minutes – citing statute as his guide.

“By what – what authority does a district court ever have the power to hear a civil service claim?”

Gorsuch was so persistent, he even apologized at one point, saying, “Sorry for taking up so much time.”

It was a process-oriented case, full of dry details that new justices are often tasked with writing opinions for.

Wednesday promises a bigger test of Gorsuch’s judicial philosophy.

“Justice Gorsuch won’t have time to settle in quietly because there [are] some hot button cases that are on the court’s doorstep,” Elizabeth Wydra said.

“Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Comer” is the case of a Missouri church school challenging the state’s denial of a grant to resurface the school playground. Missouri contends its state constitution bars state funds from going to churches.

“We know that Judge Gorsuch has written before on religious liberty issues when this case gets teed up for argument and decisions all eyes will be on Judge Gorsuch because he’s the one who’s going to break the tie,” Tom Dupree said.

As the court’s newest member, Gorsuch will undergo a mild hazing ritual. At the closed door votes where justices decide which cases to hear, Gorsuch will be required to fetch coffee for the others, to answer frequent knocks on the door and to become a member of the court’s cafeteria committee. No small job, given that justices eat together after oral arguments.

Previous member Justice Kagan jokingly complained, “They’ll say, ‘This soup is very salty,’ and I’m like, supposed to go fix it myself?”

Kagan served for six years on that committee, and Justice Breyer served 11 years. Many wonder if Gorsuch’s hazing will be shorter, given speculation about another high court opening sometime soon.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 30, 2022

RELEASE: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Reconstruction Provides Critical Lessons

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing new scholarship by CAC Civil Rights Director...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 29, 2022

ISSUE BRIEF: Court Reform and the Promise of Justice: Lessons from Reconstruction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023 The Supreme Court is broken....
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche