Rule of Law

USC students react to Trump’s indictment

The former president is expected to appear in court tomorrow

Tomorrow, former President Trump will appear in court, marking the first time in U.S. history that a current or former president has faced criminal charges. Before the historic event, students shared their perspective on the situation. Kimberly Aguirre reports.

Today, former President Donald Trump flew from Florida to New York and landed in La Guardia airport in preparation of his arraignment tomorrow.

This comes after Trump was indicted by a grand jury in Manhattan last Thursday.

As of Monday afternoon, the exact charges against Trump are unknown, but they are believed to involve hush money that Trump allegedly paid to an adult film actress.

Praveen Fernandes, the vice president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, a nonprofit public interest law firm in Washington D.C., believes that although the courtroom process will be typical, the nature of the situation is extraordinary.

Praveen Fernandes: I think there has rightly been a lot of attention on the unprecedented nature of the defendants here. And we have never had a president go through his process of fingerprinting, a mug shot instead of being a former president who has been charged and indicted for a crime. But the actual process itself is is not that exceptional.

According to information provided by Fernandes, Trump plans to plead not guilty. Yet, if Trump is found guilty, the ruling would not bar him from running for office.

The unprecedented nature of this event is also something that resonates with the USC community.

All around campus, students are reacting to this historic event. One of them is Luc Hosy, a junior studying arts, technology, and the business of innovation, who believes that Trump still being able to run for president speaks to a larger issue.

Luc Hosy: I think the fact that he’s running for president despite being indicted, I think that shows that there might be a a gap in the political system in which we need to create edits and need to think about because now we have this new example in our history. I think that’s cause for for some change.

Others such as Macie Burgard, a senior studying civil engineering, believe that changes should also come in the way that presidents conduct themselves.

Macie Burgard: Presidents will maybe feel like a little bit more responsibility and less like laws don’t apply to them, because I feel like that’s maybe an issue in the past, like being above the law a little bit.

But ultimately, what this has done is create conversations. Something that Jake Berg, a sophomore studying intelligence and cyber operations, hopes will cause a moment of reckoning for all Americans.

Jake Berg: Hopefully people realize that it’s important to talk to people across the aisle or respect your counterpart’s like I think both sides need to take back you, right? Like obviously MAGA people are pretty intense, but also on on the other side of the aisle, people who condemn them and and don’t recognize them as like fellow Americans, I think that’s a step too far as well. So I think hopefully this has made people realize that we need to just kind of embrace each other as Americans and hopefully change things in the future.

Trump will appear in court around 2:15 eastern time. After which, he is expected to fly back to Florida.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
September 8, 2024

Justice delayed is political: Trump’s election interference case must continue ahead of the election

Salon
The Supreme Court conservative majority’s opinion in Trump v. United States has rightly drawn considerable criticism.  Its...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Donald K. Sherman
Rule of Law
September 5, 2024

Reflections on my Kendall Fellowship

On my first day at the Constitutional Accountability Center, I worked on a brief about...
By: Jess Zalph
Rule of Law
September 2, 2024

Transgender rights, ghost guns, porn ID cases on Supreme Court docket; stakes high in next term

The Washington Times
The Supreme Court is still on its three-month summer recess but already has loaded its docket with...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, Alex Swoyer
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Iowa v. SEC

In Iowa v. SEC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is considering the legality of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s new climate-related disclosure requirements.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB

In Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering the legality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s update to its Examination Manual clarifying that discrimination may...
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Lackey v. Stinnie

In Lackey v. Stinnie, the Supreme Court is considering when a civil rights plaintiff is entitled to attorney’s fees as the “prevailing party” in a case.