Civil and Human Rights

Victory Against Cash Bail in Conservative Circuit Court of Appeals

WASHINGTON—In a unanimous opinion this afternoon in ODonnell v. Harris, written by George W. Bush-appointed Judge Edith Brown Clement, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit largely upheld a lower court ruling that struck down the system of cash bail used in Harris County, Texas. Constitutional Accountability Center filed an amicus brief in support of ODonnell, and CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans issued the following reaction to this news: 

This is a huge, precedent-setting ruling that holds that state and local governments may not use the bail system to impose pretrial detention across-the-board on those too poor to pay. It speaks volumes that Judge Clement, a staunchly conservative jurist, found the Constitution’s promise of equal justice applies both to the rich and to the poor. Clement found that the policy presented a “basic injustice” forbidden by the Fourteenth Amendment: Those too poor to pay “sustain an absolute deprivation of their liberty interests,” while wealthy defendants, similar in all other respects, go free. With a host of similar cases pending in other courts, Clement’s analysis offers a powerful basis for ensuring equal justice for all, regardless of wealth.

#

Resources:

CAC’s brief in ODonnell v. Harris County, Texas, et al. https://www.theusconstitution.org/cases/odonnell-v-harris-county-texas-et-al-5th-cir

“When cash bail violates the Constitution,” Elizabeth Wydra, San Antonio Express-News, October 10, 2017: https://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/commentary/article/When-cash-bail-violates-the-Constitution-12267460.php

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...