Civil and Human Rights

Victory: CAC Hails Supreme Court Decision Protecting Voting Rights In Arizona Inter Tribal Council Case

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, holding by a vote of 7-2 in an opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia that Arizona’s proof of citizenship requirement is preempted by the National Voter Registration Act under the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Constitutional Accountability Center – which had urged this result – had the following reaction:

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “Today’s decision is a victory for the federal government’s authority to regulate federal elections and protect the right to vote.”

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans said, “The Court affirmed Congress’ decision to use a single federal form to help streamline the voter registration process, and prevent states like Arizona from denying the right of citizens to register to vote in federal elections.  At a time when states are engaged in voter suppression efforts, today’s opinion is an important reaffirmation that the text and history of the Elections Clause give the federal government broad power to preempt state law in order to protect the right to vote in federal elections.”

 

CAC President Doug Kendall added, “As CAC’s brief urged, the Court held that the only purpose of the Elections Clause is to displace state laws, and therefore Congress should be presumed to have displaced states when it acts. The Court got the Constitution’s text and history right in its ruling today.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

“CAC Reacts to Supreme Court Arguments In Arizona Voting Rights Case,” News Release, March 18, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/media/releases/cac-reacts-supreme-court-arguments-arizona-voting-rights-case

 

CAC’s brief in Arizona Inter Tribal Council, filed with the Brennan Center and distinguished law professors, including Jack Rakove: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/arizona-v-inter-tribal-council-arizona/arizona-v-inter-tribal-council-arizona#  

 

“The Scalia Court and Voting Rights, Part 2,” Huffington Post, March 11, 2013: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-kendall/the-scalia-court-and-voti_b_2853048.html

 

“The Voting Rights Case You Haven’t Heard Of,” Balkinization, March 11, 2013: http://balkin.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-voting-rights-case-you-havent-heard.html

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

New York v. Trump

In New York v. Trump, the First Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral and categorical decision to freeze all federal funding to programs that do not align with its policy priorities violates federal...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Martin v. United States

In Martin v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Supremacy Clause overrides the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)’s express waiver of sovereign immunity when a federal employee’s actions “have some nexus with...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Pacito v. Trump

In Pacito v. Trump, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to dismantle the United States Refugee Assistance Program (USRAP), including by suspending all USRAP funding, violates federal law and the...
Rule of Law
March 13, 2025

March 2025 Newsletter: Ongoing Challenges and New Victories

Rule of Law
March 7, 2025

TV (Bloomberg): Could Trump Saying Musk Heads DOGE Create Legal Issue?

Bloomberg TV
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Catholic Charities Fort Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services

In Catholic Charities Forth Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to freeze funding appropriated for...