Civil and Human Rights

Victory for Marriage Equality and the Constitution

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court ruling that California’s Proposition 8, which limits marriage to heterosexual couples in the state, is unconstitutional, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following statement.

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “In its opinion today, the appeals court affirmed that the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause applies to all ‘persons’ in this country and forbids the government from stripping rights away from any group of persons based on prejudice. That is a victory not only for gay men and lesbians who want to marry, but also for every American who values our Constitution’s guarantee of equality.”

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans added, “‘We the People’ took the principle of equality in the Declaration of Independence and perfected it in the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.  Contrary to the flawed views of those such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, the Ninth Circuit panel majority today showed that conservative advocate Ted Olson’s view of the broad sweep of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equality is the right one.”

#

Resources:

Constitutional Accountability Center’s “friend of the court” brief in Perry v. Brownhttps://www.theusconstitution.org/cases/perry-v-brown

CAC’s analysis of the December 2010 oral argument in Perry : https://www.theusconstitution.org/text-history/2411

Perfecting the Declaration: The Text and History of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, David Gans, November 2011: https://www.theusconstitution.org/media/releases/new-study-shows-why-justice-scalia-wrong-%E2%80%93-and-ted-olson-right-%E2%80%93-constitutional

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

 

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

Supreme Court yet to decide on Election Day, Trump firings

Roll Call
CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod and her fellow panelists at CAC's 13th Annual Home Stretch at...
Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

CAC Release: Arraignment of SPLC Yet Another Step in Trump Administration March Against American Rights and Freedoms

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to today’s arraignment of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Constitutional...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

Bondi Corroded DOJ’s Integrity. Congress Must Now Demand Change

Bloomberg Law
CAC Vice President Praveen Frenandes and former DC Bar President Patrick McGlone co-authored an article...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Patrick McGlone
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC

In Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, the Third Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Sosnava Rodriguez v. Ortega

In Sosnava Rodriguez v. Ortega, the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget

In Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether President Trump’s Office of Management and...