Civil and Human Rights

Victory for Marriage Equality and the Constitution

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court ruling that California’s Proposition 8, which limits marriage to heterosexual couples in the state, is unconstitutional, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following statement.

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “In its opinion today, the appeals court affirmed that the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause applies to all ‘persons’ in this country and forbids the government from stripping rights away from any group of persons based on prejudice. That is a victory not only for gay men and lesbians who want to marry, but also for every American who values our Constitution’s guarantee of equality.”

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans added, “‘We the People’ took the principle of equality in the Declaration of Independence and perfected it in the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.  Contrary to the flawed views of those such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, the Ninth Circuit panel majority today showed that conservative advocate Ted Olson’s view of the broad sweep of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equality is the right one.”



Constitutional Accountability Center’s “friend of the court” brief in Perry v. Brown

CAC’s analysis of the December 2010 oral argument in Perry :

Perfecting the Declaration: The Text and History of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, David Gans, November 2011:


Constitutional Accountability Center ( is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.



More from Civil and Human Rights

Corporate Accountability

Intuit, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

In Intuit Inc v. Federal Trade Commission, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the FTC’s authority to issue cease-and-desist orders against false and misleading advertising is constitutional.
Rule of Law
June 20, 2024

Opinion | The tragedy of the Supreme Court’s bump stock ruling

Washington Post
Don’t let technicalities, or a refusal to use common sense, become the enemy of public...
By: Nina Henry
Access to Justice
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court rejects artificial limit on liability for speech-based retaliation by government officers

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s Supreme Court decision in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case in...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: In narrow ruling, Supreme Court rejects baseless effort to shield corporate-derived income from taxation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Moore v. United...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
June 19, 2024

The Supreme Court’s approach on ‘history and tradition’ is irking Amy Coney Barrett

Washington (CNN) — On a Supreme Court where the conservative supermajority increasingly leans on history as a...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Devan Cole, John Fritze