Rule of Law

Victory For Marriage Equality And The Constitution In Utah

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit issued its ruling in Kitchen v. Herbert, striking down Utah’s ban on marriage equality, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following reaction:

 

CAC Vice President Judith E. Schaeffer said, “Today’s ruling by the 10th Circuit is another in a long line of recent holdings by courts across the country that our Constitution requires marriage equality, eloquently describing our ‘commitment as Americans to the principles of liberty, due process of law, and equal protection of the laws’ in the text and history of our Nation’s charter. 

 

“Indeed, the majority on today’s panel— a judge appointed by a Democratic president and one by a Republican president—once again proves that strong arguments rooted in the Constitution’s text and history can unite judges from across the ideological spectrum,” Schaeffer continued.

 

“Ironically, on the same day that a unanimous Supreme Court applied the privacy principles of the Fourth Amendment to cell phones – a technology that the Framers could not possibly have imagined and that of course is not mentioned in the Constitution – Judge Paul Kelly, in dissent from today’s 10th Circuit ruling, noted that the Constitution ‘does not speak to the issue of same-gender marriage,’ and then proceeded to misconstrue the equal protection principles of the Fourteenth Amendment as failing to protect same-sex couples from marriage discrimination.”

 

“Judge Kelly is wrong,” Schaeffer said, “and his Tenth Circuit colleagues were correct in holding that the Fourteenth Amendment ‘extends the guarantees of due process and equal protection to every person in every State of the Union.’ That includes gay men and lesbians in the state of Utah.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief, together with the Cato Institute, in Kitchen v. Herbert: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/CAC-Amicus-Kitchen-v-Herbert.pdf

 

“Who Will be the First?,” Judith E. Schaeffer, May 22, 2014: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2682/who-will-be-first

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Rule of Law

Corporate Accountability
 

Intuit, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

In Intuit Inc v. Federal Trade Commission, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the FTC’s authority to issue cease-and-desist orders against false and misleading advertising is constitutional.
Rule of Law
June 20, 2024

Opinion | The tragedy of the Supreme Court’s bump stock ruling

Washington Post
Don’t let technicalities, or a refusal to use common sense, become the enemy of public...
By: Nina Henry
Access to Justice
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court rejects artificial limit on liability for speech-based retaliation by government officers

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s Supreme Court decision in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case in...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: In narrow ruling, Supreme Court rejects baseless effort to shield corporate-derived income from taxation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Moore v. United...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
June 19, 2024

The Supreme Court’s approach on ‘history and tradition’ is irking Amy Coney Barrett

CNN
Washington (CNN) — On a Supreme Court where the conservative supermajority increasingly leans on history as a...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Devan Cole, John Fritze