Rule of Law

Victory For Marriage Equality And The Constitution In Utah

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit issued its ruling in Kitchen v. Herbert, striking down Utah’s ban on marriage equality, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following reaction:

 

CAC Vice President Judith E. Schaeffer said, “Today’s ruling by the 10th Circuit is another in a long line of recent holdings by courts across the country that our Constitution requires marriage equality, eloquently describing our ‘commitment as Americans to the principles of liberty, due process of law, and equal protection of the laws’ in the text and history of our Nation’s charter. 

 

“Indeed, the majority on today’s panel— a judge appointed by a Democratic president and one by a Republican president—once again proves that strong arguments rooted in the Constitution’s text and history can unite judges from across the ideological spectrum,” Schaeffer continued.

 

“Ironically, on the same day that a unanimous Supreme Court applied the privacy principles of the Fourth Amendment to cell phones – a technology that the Framers could not possibly have imagined and that of course is not mentioned in the Constitution – Judge Paul Kelly, in dissent from today’s 10th Circuit ruling, noted that the Constitution ‘does not speak to the issue of same-gender marriage,’ and then proceeded to misconstrue the equal protection principles of the Fourteenth Amendment as failing to protect same-sex couples from marriage discrimination.”

 

“Judge Kelly is wrong,” Schaeffer said, “and his Tenth Circuit colleagues were correct in holding that the Fourteenth Amendment ‘extends the guarantees of due process and equal protection to every person in every State of the Union.’ That includes gay men and lesbians in the state of Utah.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief, together with the Cato Institute, in Kitchen v. Herbert: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/CAC-Amicus-Kitchen-v-Herbert.pdf

 

“Who Will be the First?,” Judith E. Schaeffer, May 22, 2014: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2682/who-will-be-first

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Rule of Law

Immigration and Citizenship
June 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Misunderstands Immigration Law—and the Presumption of Extraterritoriality—in Decision about Asylum-Seekers at the Border

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Noem v. Al Otro...
By: Smita Ghosh
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: In Deeply Disappointing Decision, Supreme Court Ignores Ordinary Meaning of Statute and Denies Victims of Torture Their Day in Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Cisco Systems v. Doe,...
By: Harith Khawaja
Rule of Law
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Decision on Excessive Fines Clause Reaches the Wrong Result, But Gets the Standard Right

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Pung v. Isabella County,...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority Undermines Important Right Created by Congress

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Landor v. Louisiana Department...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Rule of Law
June 22, 2026

The Supreme Court Is About to Decide Four Cases Defining Trump’s Power

The Wall Street Journal
CAC President Elizabeth Wydra spoke to the Wall Street Journal about the major decisions left...
Rule of Law
June 21, 2026

Trump DOJ in CRISIS MODE

Legal AF
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes joined the Legal AF podcast to discuss Todd Blanche's nomination...