Victory For Sixth Amendment In Hurst

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Hurst v. Florida, holding that Florida’s death penalty sentencing scheme violates the Sixth Amendment, Constitutional Accountability Center – which filed an amicus brief in the case together with the American Civil Liberties Union – had the following reaction:

 

CAC Appellate Counsel Brianne Gorod said, “The Court affirmed in unequivocal terms the importance of the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury, with only Justice Alito in dissent. The Court made clear that a state cannot impose a death sentence without a jury making the factual findings required by law.”

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra added, “The Court should be applauded today for being faithful to the text and history of our Constitution.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Hurst v. Florida: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/hurst-v-florida-us-sup-ct 

 

Prediction in 2005 after Alito’s nomination to the Court: “There will be no one to the right of Sam Alito on this Court,” Jonathan Turley, NBC News Today Show, October 30, 2015: http://media.pfaw.org/stc/alito-final.pdf 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from

Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 23, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

State of Washington v. Trump

In State of Washington v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least...