Civil and Human Rights

Victory For The Constitution, And For Marriage Equality

SUPREME COURT PLAZA, Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its ruling in the marriage equality case Obergefell v. Hodges, Constitutional Accountability Center lawyers — who were in the Court for today’s announcement — issued the following reaction:

 

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “In a resounding victory for gay and lesbian couples, the Court today ruled that the U.S. Constitution recognizes a right to marriage equality under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process and and Equal Protection Clauses. In simple, but profoundly important words, Justice Kennedy declared, ‘the petitioners simply ask for equal dignity, and the Constitution grants it to them.'”

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans said, “Protecting liberty and equality for all is at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantees. Today, the Court powerfully reaffirmed these core constitutional protections.”

 

CAC Vice President Judith E. Schaeffer said, “Chief Justice Roberts said that today’s ruling ‘has nothing to do with the Constitution.’ He is utterly wrong. The Constitution has everything to do with this historic day.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Obergefell v. Hodges: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/CAC_Amicus-Obergefell_v_Hodges.pdf

 

“Hopeful after almost 30 years of waiting in line for marriage equality,” Judith E. Schaeffer, USA Today,

April 28, 2015: http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/04/28/marriage-equality-supreme-court-lawyers-column/26522929/

 

“Legal ground flimsy for state gay marriage bans,” David H. Gans, Detroit (MI) Free Press, April 25, 2015: http://www.freep.com/story/opinion/contributors/2015/04/25/gay-marriage-supreme-court/26340649/

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 26, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...