Civil and Human Rights

Victory for the Constitution in Court’s Affirmative Action Ruling

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas-Austin, Constitutional Accountability Center Civil Rights Director David Gans issued the following reaction: 

 

“In rejecting the claims of Abigail Fisher and Ed Blum today, Justice Kennedy wrote powerfully to explain that ‘the Equal Protection Clause does not force universities to choose between a diverse student body and a reputation for academic excellence.’ As we showed in our brief, the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment were the originators of affirmative action, and today’s ruling is consonant with their understanding of the text, history, and purpose of the Equal Protection Clause.”

 

#

 

Resources

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief in Fisher v. UT Austin: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/fisher-v-university-texas-austin-us-sup-ct 

 

“Blind to History,” David H. Gans, CAC Text and History blog, January 8, 2016: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/3556/blind-history 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Voting Rights and Democracy
March 24, 2025

The Supreme Court Just Put the Voting Rights Act in Its Crosshairs Again

Slate
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Louisiana v. Callais, an important battle over...
By: Anna Jessurun
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco

In Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to defund and dismantle the Inter-American Foundation violates federal law and...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 24, 2025

RELEASE: Immigration Provision at Heart of Today’s Oral Argument Should Not Be a Jurisdictional Trap for Unwary Immigrants

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court today in Riley v. Bondi,...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 24, 2025

RELEASE: Supreme Court Hears Challenge to State Efforts to Remedy Voting Rights Act Violation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Louisiana v....
Civil and Human Rights
March 26, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Access to Justice
March 19, 2025

Fight over False Claims Act whistleblower provision heats up on appeal

Reuters
At first glance, it might seem far-fetched to suggest a whistleblower law that’s been on...