Voting Rights and Democracy

Victory For Voting Rights And Constitution In Fourth Circuit

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that the North Carolina legislature passed voting restrictions with discriminatory intent and permanently enjoined (that is, totally blocked) those restrictions, including a photo ID requirement, Constitutional Accountability Center Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod released the following reaction:

 

“When Chief Justice John Roberts and the Supreme Court’s other conservatives eviscerated the preclearance provision of the Voting Rights Act in the 2013 Shelby County decision, they flashed a green light to conservative elected officials across the country looking for ways to restrict access to the ballot box. The North Carolina legislature saw this signal and enacted a host of voting roadblocks with no obvious purpose other than to keep certain disfavored constituencies – African-Americans foremost among them – from exercising their right to vote as easily as other voters. The Court of Appeals unanimously and correctly flashed a red light to that approach today, finding that the legislature had enacted those provisions with ‘discriminatory intent,’ in violation of the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. 

 

“Other like-minded public officials should take notice. Rather than restrict voting access on the basis of race, they should honor the Constitution’s text and history and make it easier to vote, not harder.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief in North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. McCrory: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/north-carolina-state-conference-naacp-v-mccrory-4th-cir 

 

“Voter ID Meets the Voting Rights Act: The Next Big Voting Rights Battle,” David Gans, Balkinization, May 19, 2016: http://balkin.blogspot.com/2016/05/voter-id-meets-voting-rights-act-next.html 

 

Voting Rights And The Constitution & Cases In The Courts: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/Voting%20Rights%20Graphic%20(Web).pdf 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
March 24, 2025

The Supreme Court Just Put the Voting Rights Act in Its Crosshairs Again

Slate
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Louisiana v. Callais, an important battle over...
By: Anna Jessurun
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco

In Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to defund and dismantle the Inter-American Foundation violates federal law and...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 24, 2025

RELEASE: Immigration Provision at Heart of Today’s Oral Argument Should Not Be a Jurisdictional Trap for Unwary Immigrants

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court today in Riley v. Bondi,...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 24, 2025

RELEASE: Supreme Court Hears Challenge to State Efforts to Remedy Voting Rights Act Violation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Louisiana v....
Civil and Human Rights
March 26, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Access to Justice
March 19, 2025

Fight over False Claims Act whistleblower provision heats up on appeal

Reuters
At first glance, it might seem far-fetched to suggest a whistleblower law that’s been on...