Rule of Law

We need transparency from Trump

Regarding the May 15 Metro article “Trump hotel suit is revived by court”:

The recent decision by the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit allowing the emoluments clause suit by the District and Maryland to continue shows that the courts need not sit idly by as the president ignores some of our Constitution’s most powerful anti-corruption provisions.

President Trump needs to comply with the foreign and domestic emoluments clauses — just as presidents from both political parties have done for hundreds of years. The American people deserve to be assured that when a president makes decisions, these decisions are made in service of the best interests of the nation, not the best interests of the president. Unfortunately, as demonstrated by $970,000 in U.S. government payments to Mr. Trump’s company, the American people currently have no such assurances.

Elizabeth WydraWashington

The writer is president of the Constitutional
Accountability Center, which represents
members of Congress in their lawsuit alleging
violations of the foreign emoluments clause.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 22, 2025

PODCAST NPR’s The Indicator from Planet Money: How Trump is making coin from $TRUMP coin

NPR
[audio mp3="https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/NPR7405315985.mp3"][/audio] Just before Trump began his second administration in January, he and his business...
Rule of Law
May 20, 2025

CAC Release: Attempts to Intimidate Public Officials Doing Their Jobs Should Concern All Americans

WASHINGTON, DC –  Upon press reports of the Trump Department of Justice’s decision to charge Congresswoman...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: Skepticism About Trump Administration’s Power Grab at Labor Rights Agencies at D.C. Circuit Argument This Morning

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

J. Doe 4 v. Musk

In J. Doe 4 v. Musk, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland is considering whether Elon Musk’s role in DOGE violates the Appointments Clause and the Constitution’s separation of powers.
Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...