Federal Courts and Nominations

While Acclaiming Srinivasan, Senate Republicans Propose A Mass Filibuster By Another Name

Washington, DC – Following the hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee this afternoon for Srikanth (“Sri”) Srinivasan, nominated by President Obama to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, Constitutional Accountability Center President Doug Kendall released the following reaction:

 

“Sri Srinivasan’s testimony today demonstrates why prominent lawyers from across the ideological spectrum have advocated his confirmation by acclaim. He rightly celebrated the ‘genius’ of the Constitution and its ‘enduring , fixed quality.’ In fact, several Senators questioned rhetorically how anyone could oppose this nomination.

 

“It is disappointing, however, that Senate Republicans would use his hearing primarily to recycle tired arguments about the workload of the DC Circuit that they rejected when President Bush was nominating judges. The legislation they proposed today is just a smokescreen to justify a future blockade of any nominees – however qualified – to this critical court. This legislation is just a mass filibuster by another name.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

“Let’s Try This Again – Judiciary Committee Hearing for Srinivasan the Next Step to Fixing the D.C. Circuit,” April 3, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1940/let%E2%80%99s-try-again-%E2%80%93-judiciary-committee-hearing-srinivasan-next-step-fixing-dc  

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

 

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Immigration and Citizenship
June 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Misunderstands Immigration Law—and the Presumption of Extraterritoriality—in Decision about Asylum-Seekers at the Border

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Noem v. Al Otro...
By: Smita Ghosh
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: In Deeply Disappointing Decision, Supreme Court Ignores Ordinary Meaning of Statute and Denies Victims of Torture Their Day in Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Cisco Systems v. Doe,...
By: Harith Khawaja
Rule of Law
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Decision on Excessive Fines Clause Reaches the Wrong Result, But Gets the Standard Right

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Pung v. Isabella County,...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority Undermines Important Right Created by Congress

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Landor v. Louisiana Department...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Rule of Law
June 22, 2026

The Supreme Court Is About to Decide Four Cases Defining Trump’s Power

The Wall Street Journal
CAC President Elizabeth Wydra spoke to the Wall Street Journal about the major decisions left...
Rule of Law
June 21, 2026

Trump DOJ in CRISIS MODE

Legal AF
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes joined the Legal AF podcast to discuss Todd Blanche's nomination...