Civil and Human Rights

With Supreme Court’s Blueford Decision, A Sad Day For Constitution

Washington, DC – On news today that the Supreme Court handed down a 6-3 decision in Blueford v. State of Arkansas – a major double jeopardy case in which a jury unanimously had said a criminal defendant was not guilty of murder – Constitutional Accountability Center released the following statement:

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “I don’t know how you declare yourself to be an ‘originalist’ and find double jeopardy not to attach in this case.  As Justice Sotomayor explained, the facts of this case are precisely why the Founders added the Double Jeopardy clause to our Bill of Rights.  It’s a sad day for the Constitution’s text and history.”

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “As the only former trial court judge on the Supreme Court bench, Justice Sotomayor knows well the threat to individual freedom from giving the prosecution two bites at the apple.”

#

Resources:

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in Blueford v. Arkansashttp://theusconstitution.org/writ-certiorari-arkansas-supreme-court

CAC’s Text and History Blog: “Double Jeopardy and the Protection of Trial By Jury: Supreme Court To Hear Oral Argument in Blueford v. Arkansas,” February 17, 2012: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1305/double-jeopardy-and-protection-trial-jury-supreme-court-hear-oral-argument

Supreme Court opinion in Blueford v. Arkansas: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1320.pdf

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...