Federal Courts and Nominations

CAC Letter to Full Senate in Support of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Nomination to U.S. Supreme Court

As defenders of the Constitution and the rule of law, CAC has a vested interest in nominations to the federal courts; and there are no nominations more important than those to the Supreme Court, one of the most powerful arbiters of constitutional liberties and protections. The American people are entitled to Supreme Court justices who will not only safeguard the whole Constitution, but also treat each litigant fairly and with dignity, and serve as an impartial, independent check on the President and Congress.

It is with these considerations in mind that CAC reviewed the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, President Joseph Biden’s nominee to the Supreme Court. Judge Jackson’s judicial record shows that she is an exceptional jurist, whose many well-reasoned opinions, authored during her tenure as a judge on the District Court for the District of Columbia and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, reflect her deep commitment to enforcing the Constitution’s text, structure, history, and values.

And throughout her Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, Judge Jackson demonstrated to the American people the temperament, fairness, and thoughtfulness she will bring to the country’s highest court. Judge Jackson has authored hundreds of opinions on many important issues of law. In this letter, we focus on five areas in which Judge Jackson has written significant constitutional rulings: (1) separation-ofpowers and rule of law; (2) freedom of speech; (3) police violence and police abuse of power; (4) equal protection; and (5) criminal justice. These rulings show that she is a superb, fair-minded jurist. She should be confirmed to be an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
August 6, 2022

Scalia’s Legacy Lives on in Supreme Court’s Abortion, Gun Cases

The seeds of the US Supreme Court’s recent rulings on guns and abortion lie in...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Greg Stohr
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 28, 2022

How the Supreme Court’s “fauxriginalists” are warping the Constitution

...The truth is that so-called modern originalists or textualists, like the late Justice Antonin Scalia...
By: Praveen Fernandes, By Kirk Swearingen
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 13, 2022

Thomas didn’t mention interracial marriage, and that’s worth talking about

Courthouse News Service
WASHINGTON (CN) — Before the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority struck it off the books last...
By: David H. Gans, Kelsey Reichmann
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 8, 2022

Progressive Groups Pressure Democrats to Move Faster on Judicial Vacancies

National Law Journal
...And progressive groups are raising alarm bells over the pace at which the Biden administration...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Avalaon Zoppo
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 8, 2022

RADIO (BBC): How the Supreme Court is reshaping the US

BBC Radio