Federal Courts and Nominations

CAC Letter to Senate Judiciary Committee in Support of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Nomination to U.S. Supreme Court

As defenders of the Constitution and the rule of law, CAC has a vested interest in nominations to the federal courts. There are no nominations more important than those to the Supreme Court, one of the most powerful arbiters of constitutional liberties and protections. The American people are entitled to Supreme Court justices who will not only safeguard the whole Constitution, but also treat each litigant fairly and with dignity, and serve as an impartial, independent check on the President and Congress.

It is with these considerations in mind that CAC reviewed the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, President Joseph Biden’s nominee to the Supreme Court. Judge Jackson’s judicial record shows that she is an exceptional jurist, whose many well-reasoned opinions, authored during her tenure as a judge on the District Court for the District of Columbia and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, reflect her deep commitment to enforcing the Constitution’s text, structure, history, and values.

Judge Jackson has authored hundreds of opinions on many important issues of law. In this letter, we focus on five areas in which Judge Jackson has written significant constitutional rulings: (1) separation-of-powers and rule of law; (2) freedom of speech; (3) police violence and police abuse of power; (4) equal protection; and (5) criminal justice. These rulings show that she is a superb, fair-minded jurist. She should be confirmed to be an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States.

The Constitution and the American people require a Supreme Court that will respect the text, history, and values of the whole Constitution, and serve as an independent check on the elected branches of government. Judge Jackson’s record shows that she passes this test of constitutional fidelity with flying colors. The Constitutional Accountability Center supports Judge Jackson’s nomination to be an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States, and urges that she be reported out of committee favorably. We also look forward to her prompt consideration and confirmation by the full Senate.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 15, 2023

How to fix the Supreme Court: Congress has the power, and simply isn’t using it

Salon
Historian David Gans on the lessons of Reconstruction, when Congress enforced reforms on a stubborn...
By: David H. Gans, By Paul Rosenberg
Federal Courts and Nominations
December 26, 2022

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dominated oral arguments and challenged conservative thinking in her first months on the Supreme Court, observers say

Business Insider
On the first day of the Supreme Court term, an attorney was delivering his closing...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Oma Seddiq
Federal Courts and Nominations
December 26, 2022

How to end gridlock and ensure Democratic power — with a bold progressive agenda

Salon
Ambitious policy solutions can break through partisan paralysis and change America. It’s time to go...
By: David H. Gans, By Paul Rosenberg
Federal Courts and Nominations
December 23, 2022

RADIO/PODCAST: SCOTUS & Originalism

Legal Talk Network
Originalism is a type of judicial interpretation of a constitution (especially the U.S. Constitution) that...
By: David H. Gans, J. Craig Williams
Federal Courts and Nominations
December 19, 2022

Top Ten Worst SCOTUS Moments of 2022

DORF ON LAW BLOG
This was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the...
By: David H. Gans, by Eric Segall