Federal Courts and Nominations

CAC’s Letter of Opposition to the Nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court

On October 9, 2020, I [CAC President Elizabeth Wydra] wrote to you expressing grave concerns about Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States and the scheduling of her confirmation hearing. The letter noted how holding the confirmation hearing at this time damages the legitimacy of the Court: there has not been a consistent standard for considering a President’s nominee to the Supreme Court during an election year, let alone once millions of votes have already been cast; the President has indicated how he expects his nominees will vote on certain issues; and he has also stated that he wants Judge Barrett on the bench in time to “look at the ballots” in the election following his repeated false claims of mail-in ballot fraud. As a result, I said, “This hearing should not be happening now.”

However, as Senate leadership insisted on the hearing moving forward, regardless of the damage it would do to the institutional integrity of the Court, I asked for you to examine closely Judge Barrett’s record and question her to determine whether she would be faithful to the text, history, and values of the whole Constitution; be fair-minded and not put her thumb on the scales of justice in favor of big business; and serve as an independent check on the President who nominated her. I had concerns that she not only passed President Trump’s litmus tests to overturn Roe v. Wade and dismantle the Affordable Care Act, but also would “work to undo the legal legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, move the Roberts Court further away from mainstream legal thought, and be a reliable vote for big business over the interests of all people.”

Unfortunately, Judge Barrett said nothing during her confirmation hearings to dispel those concerns. Furthermore, she refused to answer simple questions about the text of the Constitution that would indicate we could trust her to be an independent check on the President who nominated her. Therefore, I write to you today on behalf of the Constitutional Accountability Center to oppose her elevation to the Supreme Court.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
February 24, 2021

RELEASE: CAC Supports Confirmation of Merrick Garland as Attorney General 

WASHINGTON – Following confirmation hearings on the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to be the 78th Attorney...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
February 19, 2021

Biden gets chance to leave mark on federal judiciary as judges step aside

CBS News
Washington – The opportunity for President Biden to make his own stamp on the federal judiciary...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Melissa Quinn
Federal Courts and Nominations
February 10, 2021

OP-ED: There’s more to repairing federal courts than Supreme Court expansion

The Hill
In the waning days of the presidential campaign last year, Joe Biden appeared on the CBS News...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 21, 2021

Biden’s solicitor general will play critical role in early efforts to undo Trump policies

CNN
Washington (CNN)President Joe Biden will name a powerhouse lawyer, Elizabeth Prelogar, to serve as acting...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Ariane de Vogue
Federal Courts and Nominations
December 28, 2020

Amy Coney Barrett steers the Supreme Court to the right, but not toward President Trump

USA Today
WASHINGTON – To hear Democrats tell it, President Donald Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 7, 2021

RELEASE: President-elect Biden’s Nominations to the Department of Justice

WASHINGTON – On President-elect Joe Biden announcing nominees to key positions in the Department of Justice today, Constitutional Accountability Center President...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra