A Jurisprudence of Doubt: Judge Gorsuch’s Troubling Inconsistency About Disclosing His Constitutional Views

Summary

After months of touting his litmus tests for a Supreme Court Justice, numerous comments disparaging federal judges who do not rule in his favor, as well as authoritarian and anti-Constitution executive actions, Trump placed a profound burden on his nominee to the Supreme Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch.

During his confirmation hearing, Gorsuch had to prove to the American people that, if confirmed, he would serve as an independent check on the elected branches, especially when they violate constitutional and legislative protections, including protections against corruption; that would not be a rubber stamp for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and business interests; and that he is open-minded, fair, and guided by the whole text and history of the Constitution, and not by a right-wing political agenda.

Unfortunately, Gorsuch failed to satisfy this burden by being elusive on basic questions of constitutional rights and guarantees. He refused to shine any light on his judicial philosophy concerning voting rights, the right to choose an abortion, access to contraception, and equality for gay, lesbian and transgender people. Although he provided his views on other cases and constitutional values, Gorsuch had virtually nothing to say about these fundamental principles.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
September 17, 2018

Republicans, Democrats face risks and rewards in Brett Kavanaugh’s embattled Supreme Court nomination

USA Today
Brett Kavanaugh's suddenly endangered Supreme Court nomination creates risks for Republicans seeking to take control of...
Federal Courts and Nominations
September 3, 2018

Brett Kavanaugh prepares for Senate panel’s deep dive into his career as DC insider

FOX News
Judge Brett Kavanaugh goes before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday for confirmation hearings with...
Federal Courts and Nominations
September 3, 2018

Five reasons Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court is controversial

USA Today
Brett Kavanaugh's substantial record as a federal appeals court judge over the past 12 years has...
Federal Courts and Nominations
September 5, 2018

How bad will Trump’s abuses get? Today’s Kavanaugh hearing could provide a clue.

The Washington Post
On Wednesday, Democratic senators will get their first crack at questioning Supreme Court nominee Brett...
Federal Courts and Nominations
September 7, 2018

Kavanaugh hearing revealed the partisan divide, but not the nominee’s real views on the law

Los Angeles Times
When it was all over, the highly qualified and reliably conservative judge was headed for...
Federal Courts and Nominations
September 14, 2018

OP-ED: Kavanaugh’s alarming silence on Griswold’s affirmation of personal liberty

Bangor Daily News
In his testimony to the Senate last week, President Donald Trump’s nominee to replace Justice...
By: David H. Gans