Civil and Human Rights

Fisher Goes Back to Court in Texas

Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will once again be hearing Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the challenge to the modest use of race in college admissions that made national headlines when it was considered by the U.S. Supreme Court last Term.

In a 7-1 decision this past June, the Supreme Court sent the case back to the Fifth Circuit, holding that the lower court had applied the wrong standard in judging the constitutionality of the University’s policy.  The Court did not reach the merits of whether the policy itself was unconstitutional, and left in place precedent that upholds the pursuit of diversity as a goal in general.   Indeed, after nearly a year of suspense and speculation about what the Court’s ultimate ruling might mean for educational institutions, the Court’s decision was mostly notable for what it did not do, as CAC’s David Gans discussed at the time.

Today, on remand from the Supreme Court, a three-judge panel  of the Fifth Circuit in Austin will reconsider the validity of the University’s policy, and may send the case back to the district court for additional fact finding about UT Austin’s admissions program. 

The NAACP Legal Defense Fund will be participating in today’s oral argument.  More information from our colleagues is at LDF’s website.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
July 8, 2026

Ruling Away From America’s Second Founding

Slate
CAC’s David H. Gans wrote about the Roberts Court for Slate magazine. Read more in Slate.
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
July 1, 2026

Furthering Inclusive Constitutionalism

Jotwell
Professor Allison Brownell Tirres reviewed recent scholarship on the Black Conventions of Reconstruction by CAC’s David H....
Civil and Human Rights
June 30, 2026

CAC Release: Roberts Court’s Conservative Supermajority Hollows Out Equal Protection Guarantee

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia...
By: David H. Gans, Praveen Fernandes, Joshua Blecher-Cohen
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC

In Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Constitution permits the Department of Labor to use administrative proceedings to impose civil monetary penalties on employers who violate...