Justice Ginsburg Declares Herself an “Originalist” and then Schools Professor (and Justice Scalia) on the Meaning of the Equal Protection Clause

Much of the conversation about the Equal Protection Clause recently has centered around the stunning assertion by Justice Antonin Scalia that discrimination on the basis of sex is not prohibited by the Constitution.  Which is why yesterday’s marvelous panel celebrating the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Reed v. Reed, the first case in which the Court applied the Equal Protection Clause to prohibit discrimination against women, was so refreshing and welcome.  Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg gave a tour de force performance, explaining that the Constitution’s text protects all persons, not only men, and demonstrating why Reed is a bedrock part of our law.

During the panel, co-sponsored by the National Women’s Law Center and others, Justice Ginsburg took on and demolished Prof. Earl Maltz’s argument that, under an originalist analysis, Reed was wrongly decided.  Explaining that “I count myself as an originalist too,” Justice Ginsburg demonstrated that the our nation’s constitutional history – from the Declaration of Independence, to the invocation in the Constitution’s Preamble’s of “We the People,” to the Fourteenth Amendment’s universal guarantees of equality, and, finally, to the Nineteenth Amendment’s protection of a woman’s right to vote – supports the Court’s cases striking down state laws that denied women equal citizenship stature.   Justice Ginsburg, in particular, emphasized that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protection of equality for all persons, and in particular the framers’ prohibition on legislation creating inferior castes, read together with the Nineteenth Amendment’s specific protection of women’s equal citizenship, fully supported Reed and its progeny.

Justice Ginsburg’s remarks echo CAC’s new report, Perfecting the Declaration, released earlier this week, which examines the arc of constitutional progress:  the principle of equality first stated in the Declaration of Independence, perfected in the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and further illuminated in the Nineteenth Amendment and other Amendments.  As we demonstrate in this report, and as Justice Ginsburg rightly recognized in her remarks, the text of the Constitution as well as the full sweep of our nation’s constitutional history support a broad reading of the text’s command of equality for all persons.

A big part of Constitutional Accountability Center’s mission is to convince progressives that we can and must root the results we seek from the courts in the text and history of the Constitution.  Justice Ginsburg yesterday demonstrated perfectly just how this can be done.

 

More from

Rule of Law
November 13, 2026

Nov. 26 Newsletter: Our Takeaways from This Year’s Midterm Elections

Earlier this month, voters made their voices heard, and they plainly had a lot to...
Rule of Law
November 11, 2026

The Democrats Need to Think Bigger on Supreme Court Reform

Slate
CAC’s Elizabeth Wydra and David H. Gans wrote in Slate about Reconstruction’s lessons for Congress...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, David H. Gans
Immigration and Citizenship
November 10, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Set to Clarify Public-Rights Doctrine as it Applies to Employers who Benefit from Immigrant Labor

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Department of...
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, Smita Ghosh
Civil and Human Rights
November 9, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Precedent and Constitutional History Both Support Access to Court When Prison Staff Violate the Eighth Amendment

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Nielsen v....
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
November 3, 2026

Inside the Supreme Court case that could decide Title IX employee protections

Higher Ed Dive
CAC’s Miriam Becker-Cohen spoke to Higher Ed Dive about Crowther v. Board of Regents of the...
Civil and Human Rights
November 3, 2026

CAC Release: St. Mary Catholic Parish’s Request to Discriminate Runs Afoul of Constitutional Text and History, As Well As Supreme Court Precedent

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in St. Mary...
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, David H. Gans, Praveen Fernandes