New Book Tells the Back Story behind the Powell Memo

By David H. Gans, Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship Program

Readers of CAC’s report, A Capitalist Joker, know that we traced the aggressive advocacy of the idea that corporations should have the same rights as individuals to a memorandum written by Lewis Powell for the Chamber of Commerce shortly before Justice Powell was nominated by President Richard Nixon for a seat on the United States Supreme Court.  This fascinating and somewhat disturbing excerpt of a new book by Jeff Clement fills in many new details of this story. It is well known, as Clement details, that Lewis Powell, just a matter of months before joining the Court, played the lead role in pushing corporations to exploit what he called “an neglected opportunity in the courts,” and that the for the last forty years, the Chamber of Commerce and other corporations have successfully pursued this strategy, aided by Justice Powell, in a line of cases that culminated with the 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. FEC.   Clement explains that Powell first developed the notion that corporations have the same constitutional rights as “We the People” in the process of spreading false information about the health of cigarettes for Phillip Morris.  From 1964 until he joined the Court in 1971, Powell served as a director and member of the executive committee of Phillip Morris, and in that role, according to Clement, Powell played a critical role in trying to discredit the facts about the health of cigarettes and developing constitutional arguments against government regulation of the tobacco industry.  For example, as Clements observes, Powell promoted the idea that Phillip Morris had a First Amendment right to equal time to respond to public service announcements that warned the public of the hazards of smoking, an idea with no basis in law. The  story Clements tells — how Powell’s campaign to bend the Constitution to serve the interests of corporations culminated in Citizens United — is an important one for anyone concerned about the negative impact of  Citizens United on our democracy and everyone working to overturn the ruling.  

More from

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes