Civil and Human Rights

Our Birthday Wish: A Lincolnian Agenda for the Obama Administration

Today , as Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) joins America in celebrating the 200th anniversary of Abe Lincoln’s birth, we offer a snapshot of our work to fulfill the promise of Lincoln’s “New Birth of Freedom” under the new Obama Administration.

In November, CAC published the first in an important series of narratives aimed at revealing and reviving the lost history of our country’s progressive Constitution. Our first report, The Gem of the Constitution, highlights the text and history of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the provision of the Reconstruction Amendments that was most directly intended to guarantee fundamental rights and liberties for all Americans. In recent weeks, we have published a series of posts highlighting this report and the Privileges or Immunities Clause, in part to spell out a constitutional agenda for the new Administration that will complete what we call “the road from Lincoln to Obama.” For those readers unfamiliar with our work on the Fourteenth Amendment, we invite you to learn more:

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
June 15, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Civil and Human Rights
March 19, 2025

Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy

North Dakota's Grand Forks Herald
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
By: Nargis Aslami
Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.