Civil and Human Rights

This Day in History: Same-Sex Couples Wed in San Francisco

On February 12, 2004, upon the direction of Mayor Gavin Newsom, the City of San Francisco began offering marriage licenses to same-sex couples.  Although the California Supreme Court later held that these marriages were prohibited by state law, the City’s actions touched off a battle over marriage equality in the state that continues to this day.  In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court will take up the issue of marriage equality in the California case of Hollingsworth v. Perry on March 26, 2013.

CAC discusses marriage equality and the 14th Amednment in our Crossroads chapter, “The Meaning of Equal: Does the Constitution Prohibit Discrimination on the Basis of Gender and Sexual Orientation?

 

Couples waiting in line outside San Francisco’s City Hall.

Photo: San Francisco Chronicle.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
April 20, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Civil and Human Rights
March 19, 2025

Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy

North Dakota's Grand Forks Herald
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
By: Nargis Aslami
Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.