Voting Rights and Democracy

Shelby County v. Holder: Contemplating the Federal Government’s Continuing Role in Protecting Civil Rights in the States

Details

Tuesday, January 29, 2013
11:00 pm
American Constitution Society

Lawyers and law students alike gathered for a panel discussion about the controversial case Shelby County v. Holder, which will be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on February 27th. The issue in this case is whether Congressional re-authorization of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which requires certain states to submit changes to election practices and procedures for review by the federal government in order to prevent discriminatory voting laws, is constitutional. Those who challenge the law argue that the re-authorization exceeds Congressional authority under the Fifteenth Amendment, in violation of the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.

Featuring:

  • Natasha Korgaonkar, Assistant Counsel, Political Participation Group, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
  • Jerry Vattamala, Staff Attorney, Democracy Program, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund
  • Elizabeth B. Wydra, Chief Counsel, Constitutional Accountability Center
  • Erika L. Wood, Associate Professor of Law, New York Law School
  • Ekow N. Yankah, Professor of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

And moderated by:

  • Ari Berman, Writer, The Nation; Investigative Journalism Fellow, The Nation Institute

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
March 23, 2026

The Alito Wing of the Supreme Court Sure Sounds Sold on Trump’s Voter Fraud Lies

Slate
CAC Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David H. Gans' article...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 23, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Conspiracy-Brained Justices Are Ready to Limit Mail-In Voting

Balls and Strikes
Balls & Strikes summarized the arguments in Watson v. RNC, linking to CAC's brief. Read more at...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 21, 2026

Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick: The Roberts Court’s Internal Reckoning

Slate
The Constitutional Accountability Center's brief in Watson v. RNC was discussed on Slate's Amicus podcast. Listen to the full...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 23, 2026

CAC Release: The Conservative Attack on Voting By Mail Comes to the Supreme Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Watson v....
By: David H. Gans, Simon Chin
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

“Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting”

Election Law Blog
CAC Senior Research Associate Lucy Resar‘s research on the history of absentee voting was featured on Election Law Blog....
By: Lucy Resar
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting

Over the past two decades, the Supreme Court has steadily eroded access to the ballot....
By: Lucy Resar