Civil and Human Rights

Toward a More Perfect Union: The LGBTQ Community and the Constitution

Join ACS and HRC for an afternoon symposium addressing the relationship between the LGBTQ community, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has played an essential role in advancing LGBTQ rights, from striking down state sodomy laws as unconstitutional to recognizing the rights of opposite-sex couples to marry and establishing marriage equality nationwide. However, LGBTQ people have also had their rights denied at the Supreme Court, and the loss of Justice Kennedy may place certain unresolved legal rights in jeopardy. 

Details

Wednesday, August 22, 2018
3:30 pm
Equality Forum
Human Rights Campaign
1640 Rhode Island Avenue NW
American Constitution Society and Human Rights Campaign

Event description authored by host organization. Information here does not necessarily reflect the views of CAC and may not be up to date — please refer to RSVP link for the latest information.


Toward a More Perfect Union: The LGBTQ Community and the Constitution

Join ACS and HRC for an afternoon symposium addressing the relationship between the LGBTQ community, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has played an essential role in advancing LGBTQ rights, from striking down state sodomy laws as unconstitutional to recognizing the rights of opposite-sex couples to marry and establishing marriage equality nationwide. However, LGBTQ people have also had their rights denied at the Supreme Court, and the loss of Justice Kennedy may place certain unresolved legal rights in jeopardy. In the coming years, the Supreme Court will be asked to decide cases that will have a critical impact on LGBTQ people, including:

  • Whether nondiscrimination laws include protections for LGBTQ people.
  • Whether individuals and organizations have a license to discriminate against LGBTQ people when receiving taxpayer dollars.
  • Whether LGBTQ people and families can be turned away from businesses open to the general public.
  • Whether qualified transgender people can be excluded from serving in the military.

We need a Justice who recognizes LGBTQ people’s fundamental rights and basic equality. Americans also need a Supreme Court Justice who is fair-minded, committed to impartial judgments and policies based upon fact—not ideology. This symposium will examine the current state of the law and what is at stake in the future.

Our agenda and confirmed speakers include:

1:30 Welcome

  • Caroline Fredrickson, President of ACS
  • JoDee Winterhof, Senior Vice President, Policy and Political Affairs, HRC

1:45 Due Process, Privacy, and LGBTQ Rights

  • Paul Smith, Campaign Legal Center (Confirmed)
  • Shannon Minter, National Center for Lesbian Rights (Confirmed)
  • Nancy J. Knauer, Temple University Beasley School of Law (Confirmed)

2:30 Equal Protection: Marriage Equality and Beyond

  • Sharon McGowan, Lambda Legal (Confirmed)
  • Ria Tabacco Mar, American Civil Liberties Union (Confirmed)
  • Steve Sanders, Indiana University Maurer School of Law (Confirmed)

3:30 What’s at Stake?

  • Katie Eyer, Rutgers Law (Confirmed)
  • Harper Jean Tobin, National Center for Transgender Equality (Confirmed)
  • Sarah Warbelow, Human Rights Campaign (Confirmed)
  • Praveen Fernandes, Constitutional Accountability Center (Confirmed)

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
June 17, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Civil and Human Rights
March 19, 2025

Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy

North Dakota's Grand Forks Herald
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
By: Nargis Aslami
Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.