Civil and Human Rights

A constitutional amendment passed after the Civil War is behind the battle

By German Lopez

 

Since the 14th Amendment was established in the aftermath of the Civil War, it’s widely misperceived to only protect racial minorities. But constitutional scholars argue that the amendment was purposely broad to protect anyone from discrimination — even groups of people that the amendment’s authors couldn’t possibly predict would face discrimination or one day be accepted by society.

 

The 14th Amendment “was designed to, really, perfect the promise of the Declaration of Independence,” Judith Schaeffer, vice president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, said. “The purpose and the meaning of the 14th Amendment is to make clear that no state can take no group of citizens and make them second-class.”

 

Schaeffer, who has studied the history of the 14th Amendment, said it was purposely written in a broad manner to cover groups of people that go beyond race. “The authors of the 14th Amendment rejected drafts and proposals that would have limited the 14th Amendment just to racial discrimination,” she said. “Instead, they put in language that protects any person — not just on the basis of race, but any person.”

 

The amendment accomplishes this by requiring states to enforce their laws equally among all groups. So, in the case of same-sex marriage, states’ bans likely violate the 14th Amendment because they purposely exclude gay and lesbian couples from marriage laws.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 11, 2024

The People Who Dismantled Affirmative Action Have a New Strategy to Crush Racial Justice

Slate
Last summer, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority struck...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
April 12, 2024

TV (Gray TV): CAC’s Frazelle Joins Gray TV to Discuss Fourth Amendment Case at Supreme Court

Gray TV Washington News Bureau
Civil and Human Rights
April 22, 2024

RELEASE: Justices grapple with line-drawing but resist overturning important precedent in Eighth Amendment homelessness case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in City of...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
April 19, 2024

Will the Supreme Court Uphold the 14th Amendment and Block an Oregon Law Criminalizing Homelessness?

Nearly 38 million Americans live in poverty. In some areas and among some populations, entrenched economic...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
April 18, 2024

DEI critics were hoping that the Supreme Court’s Muldrow decision would undermine corporate diversity programs. It does no such thing

Fortune
The Supreme Court just delivered a big win for workers and workplace equality–but conservatives are...