Civil and Human Rights

Administration asks Supreme Court to rehear immigration case

By Lydia Wheeler

The Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to rehear a case challenging President Obama’s executive actions on immigration.

 

The court was deadlocked 4-4 in its decision in June, leaving a lower court order standing that blocks a program allowing undocumented immigrants who are parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents to remain in the United States for three years and apply for work permits.

 

The decision also prevents the administration from otherwise expanding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program issued by Obama in 2012.

The case, U.S. v. Texas, is the most prominent to end in a tie since the unexpected passing of Justice Antonin Scalia in February. His death has left the court divided with an equal number of justices on the conservative and liberal wings; the Senate is refusing to consider Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland.

 

The Justice Department said the lower court’s preliminary injunction would now prevent the government from carrying out the programs nationwide. It urged the Supreme Court to revisit the case when it had a full bench of nine justices.

 

“There is no reason to expect that the district court would issue a permanent injunction that is narrower; and no other pending case challenges the Guidance,” the agency said in it’s petition.

 

“Unless the court resolves this case in a precedential manner, a matter of ‘great national importance’ involving an ‘unprecedented and momentous’ injunction barring implementation of the guidance will have been effectively resolved for the country as a whole by a court of appeals that has divided twice, with two judges voting for petitioners and two for respondent states.”

 

The DOJ argued that there have been cases in the past where the justices revisited a case that had deadlocked because of a vacancy.

 

The appeal comes with the president and Republicans at loggerheads over confirming a ninth justice.

 

Democrats and Obama have used the deadlocked rulings to urge the Senate to confirm a new justice to replace Scalia. But Senate Republicans have said they will not move on Obama’s nominee this year. 

 

“Because we have a short-staffed Court unable to issue a decision on the DAPA program, a regional lower court has been able to put unprecedented constraints on the executive and stop a federal policy nationwide, affecting millions of American families,” Elizabeth Wydra, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, said in a statement.

 

“This petition highlights why the Senate leadership needs to stop its hyper-partisan gamesmanship and consider the President’s Supreme Court nominee, so the Court can fulfill its constitutional role of declaring what the law is.”

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Skrmetti

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is considering whether Tennessee’s ban on providing gender-affirming medical care to transgender adolescents violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Civil and Human Rights
July 31, 2024

Supreme Court Allows Cities to Punish Homelessness

The Regulatory Review
At the end of its 2023-24 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several divided decisions...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 28, 2024

RELEASE: Ignoring constitutional history and original meaning, conservative majority allows city governments to punish people for sleeping in public even if they have nowhere else to go

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in City of Grants Pass...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 11, 2024

The People Who Dismantled Affirmative Action Have a New Strategy to Crush Racial Justice

Slate
Last summer, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority struck...
By: David H. Gans