Civil and Human Rights

OP-ED: DONNELLY: Remembering our forgotten founders

Works on Abraham Lincoln consistently top national bestseller lists — “Team of Rivals,” “Lincoln on Leadership,” even “Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter.” Perhaps it is little wonder, then, that Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln continues to rank in the top five movies at the box office. It is all the more fitting since today the nation marks the 147th anniversary of the 13th Amendment and its ban on slavery — the congressional debate over which is dramatized so well in Spielberg’s film. Ratified just months after Lincoln’s assassination, the 13th Amendment served as a foundation for the “new birth of freedom” Lincoln envisioned in his Gettysburg Address.

Americans are drawn to Lincoln for a variety of reasons — Lincoln as wartime president; Lincoln as the Great Emancipator; Lincoln as martyr. Indeed, rarely has so multifaceted a person inhabited the White House, and perhaps never in as perilous a time in our nation’s history. As a result, Lincoln continues to occupy a privileged place in American public memory and rightly so.

Nevertheless, in our collective reverence for Lincoln, we often give short shrift to the generation of leaders who succeeded him and who radically improved our nation’s founding charter after a bloody Civil War. These forgotten Founders — Thaddeus Stevens, Charles Sumner and John Bingham, among others, shared Lincoln’s goal of securing a “new birth of freedom” for all Americans and of realizing the promise of Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence.

Indeed, as Stevens explained near the beginning of Reconstruction, “Our fathers had been compelled to postpone the principles of their great Declaration and wait for their full establishment until a more propitious time. That time ought to be present now.”

Concededly, our forgotten Founders were no saints. (Then again, neither was Lincoln.) However, in their personal commitments and collective aspirations, we see (more than) a bit of ourselves. Prior to the Civil War, Stevens defended fugitive slaves in court, Sumner fought for school desegregation in Boston and Bingham envisioned a federal Constitution that would protect the fundamental freedoms of all Americans.

Of course, Stevens, Sumner and Bingham failed to achieve many of their goals during Reconstruction. Nevertheless, in the face of Southern intransigence and unprecedented violence, they still accomplished a great deal. In the words of Yale law professor Akhil Reed Amar, these leaders “ended slavery, made every person born under the flag an equal citizen, guaranteed a host of civil rights to all Americans, and extended equal political rights to black men.” As a result, many scholars have rightly described Reconstruction and its related constitutional amendments, as a “Second Founding.”

Despite these achievements, few Americans have likely thought about Reconstruction (or its leaders) since their high school history classes — and, even then, they are as likely to remember Reconstruction as a period of Northern vengeance and national disappointment as they are as a precursor to Brown v. Board of Education, Martin Luther King Jr., and the achievements of the modern civil rights movement.

There’s little doubt that this collective amnesia is caused, at least in part, by the messiness of the Reconstruction story itself. However, it’s also the result of larger historical forces — forces that pushed the North and South toward reconciliation in the early 20th century and, in turn, shaped the canonical stories that we passed along to our schoolchildren for generations thereafter.

Today’s textbooks still use the notion of Lincoln’s “gentleness” as a foil to the congressional Republicans’ “harshness.” And they still describe Thaddeus Stevens — the Reconstruction leader featured most prominently — as a “Radical avenger.” Therefore, students are still left with (at least) the faint impression that Reconstruction may have turned out differently if only it were guided by a gentler, more charitable hand.

Finally, even as Stevens takes on added prominence in our leading textbooks, John Bingham is still entirely ignored, and Charles Sumner is still remembered most for being caned on the Senate floor by Preston Brooks — or, as one modern textbook puts it, as “Bleeding Sumner.”

These forgotten Founders deserve better. Perhaps the compelling film now in theaters — with Tommy Lee Jones as Thaddeus Stevens — will inspire moviegoers to learn more about what happened next. The rest of Reconstruction — like the tale of Lincoln’s final months — is surely a story worthy of Spielberg.


This piece appeared in at least the following additional outlets:

*  The Dayton (OH) Daily News (paper)

*  The El Paso (TX) Times (online) (paper)

*  The Macon City (GA) Telegraph (online) (paper)

*  The Manitowoc (WI) Herald Times Reporter (online)

*  The Murray State (KY) News (online)

*  The Sheboygan (WI) Press (online)

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 11, 2024

The People Who Dismantled Affirmative Action Have a New Strategy to Crush Racial Justice

Last summer, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority struck...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
April 12, 2024

TV (Gray TV): CAC’s Frazelle Joins Gray TV to Discuss Fourth Amendment Case at Supreme Court

Gray TV Washington News Bureau
Civil and Human Rights
April 22, 2024

RELEASE: Justices grapple with line-drawing but resist overturning important precedent in Eighth Amendment homelessness case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in City of...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
April 19, 2024

Will the Supreme Court Uphold the 14th Amendment and Block an Oregon Law Criminalizing Homelessness?

Nearly 38 million Americans live in poverty. In some areas and among some populations, entrenched economic...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
April 18, 2024

DEI critics were hoping that the Supreme Court’s Muldrow decision would undermine corporate diversity programs. It does no such thing

The Supreme Court just delivered a big win for workers and workplace equality–but conservatives are...