Civil and Human Rights

Federal judge: Alabama judges must issue gay marriage licenses

By Ariane de Vogue

 

Washington (CNN) A federal judge in Alabama on Thursday instructed a probate judge in Mobile County to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, sending a strong signal to other judges in other counties that they, too, should follow suit.

 

United States District Court Judge Callie V. Granade wrote, “Probate Judge Don Davis is hereby enjoined from refusing to issue marriage licenses to plaintiffs due to the Alabama laws which prohibit same-sex marriage.”

 

“This injunction binds Judge Don Davis and all his officers, agents, servants and employees, and others in active concert or participation with any of them, who would seek to enforce the marriage laws of Alabama which prohibit or fail to recognize same sex marriages,” she said.

 

Although Granade had struck down Alabama’s ban on same-sex marriage in January, some probate judges had refused to issue licenses because the Chief Justice of Alabama’s Supreme Court, Roy Moore, ordered them not to.

 

An attorney for Davis issued a statement on Thursday saying the judge was “not taking sides in the national debate over same-sex marriage.”

 

“Judge Davis was stuck in a legal dilemma,” said Harry V. Satterwhite, Davis’ attorney. “He was subject to an order from U.S. District Court Judge Granade, and at the same time, he was subject to an conflicting order from Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore.”

 

“As a result of today’s Order from Judge Granade, Judge Davis is issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples in Mobile County, Alabama,” he added.

 

Further complicating the issue, Davis’ attorney said, is the fact that the Alabama Policy Group and the Alabama Citizens Action program have filed a lawsuit on Wednesday that would stop Alabama probate judges from issuing licenses to gay couples.

 

Four same-sex couples had asked Granade earlier on Thursday to clarify the scope of her original ruling.

 

“This order should make clear to all of the probate judges across Alabama that they need to follow the federal district court’s constitutional ruling striking down the state’s ban on same-sex marriage,” said Elizabeth B. Wydra, chief counsel of the Constitutional Accountability Center. “If necessary, gay and lesbian couples will haul resisting judges into court and the end result will be the same: a federal order requiring those judges to issue marriage licenses.”

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington is considering whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional. 
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2025

Equality and Protection: The Forgotten Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment

102 Denv. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2025)
Civil and Human Rights
North Dakota Supreme Court

Access Independent Health Services Inc. v. Wrigley

In Access Independent Health Services Inc. v. Wrigley, the North Dakota Supreme Court is considering whether North Dakota’s abortion ban violates the state constitution.