Civil and Human Rights

Fourth Circuit To Hear Appeals On Travel Executive Order

By Ian Stewart

Today (5/8), the Fourth Circuit of Appeals in Richmond will hear oral arguments on the case of President Trump’s second attempt at a travel ban. Senator Tim Kaine has some thoughts about it.

At a recent stop in Richmond, Senator Kaine took time out to comment on today’s hearings in the Fourth Circuit, saying that we out to have a working immigration system but one that is very cautious about security. “We should be trying to Vet everyone that comes in. And if we can Vet them, they should come in. And if they don’t Vet, they shouldn’t. But we shouldn’t treat people differently because of the country they’re from or their predominate religion,” said Kaine.

The court is considering whether President Trump’s travel and refugee ban violates the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment.

“There’s no reason to keep out a mother or child who is being brought in by catholic refugee services when we’ve answered all the questions. I’m all for safety but let’s not discriminate when we come at these safety questions,” added Kaine.

The appeal was filed back in April by the Constitutional Accountability Center on behalf of 165 members of Congress who support those who challenge the executive order.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Skrmetti

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is considering whether Tennessee’s ban on providing gender-affirming medical care to transgender adolescents violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Civil and Human Rights
July 31, 2024

Supreme Court Allows Cities to Punish Homelessness

The Regulatory Review
At the end of its 2023-24 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several divided decisions...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 28, 2024

RELEASE: Ignoring constitutional history and original meaning, conservative majority allows city governments to punish people for sleeping in public even if they have nowhere else to go

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in City of Grants Pass...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 11, 2024

The People Who Dismantled Affirmative Action Have a New Strategy to Crush Racial Justice

Slate
Last summer, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority struck...
By: David H. Gans