Rule of Law

RELEASE: In a Major Victory for Federalism and Democracy, Supreme Court Rejects So-Called Independent State Legislature Theory As Contrary to the Constitution’s Text and History

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision in Moore v. Harper, Constitutional Accountability Center Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David Gans issued the following reaction:

The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, recognized that the so-called independent state legislature theory has no basis in the Constitution’s text and history.  Echoing the text and history arguments presented in CAC’s amicus brief, the Chief Justice’s opinion resoundingly affirmed that “the Elections Clause does not insulate state legislatures from the ordinary exercise of state judicial review.”  This is an important reaffirmation of a fundamental Founding-era principle: state courts can vindicate voting rights guarantees enshrined in state constitutions to limit state regulation of congressional elections.  A majority of the Court correctly rejected the radical and dangerous notion that state legislatures are free from state constitutional constraints when regulating congressional elections.

The most dangerous and sweeping version of the independent state legislature theory is now dead.  But litigation over the issue is far from over.  The Court suggested that federal courts would have the power to review state court judgments to ensure that state courts do not “transgress the ordinary bounds of judicial review” and “arrogate to themselves the power vested in state legislatures to regulate federal elections.”  But federal courts do not have the power to second-guess state court rulings simply because they may disagree with a state court’s interpretation.  If courts heed the Constitution’s text and history—as the Supreme Court rightly did today—any review of state court interpretations of state constitutional law must be appropriately deferential.

##

Resources:

Case page in Moore v. Harper: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/moore-v-harper/

David H. Gans, Originalism Demands Only One Answer in the Supreme Court’s Big Elections Case, Slate: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/11/originalism-supreme-courts-moore-harper-elections-case.html

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...
Rule of Law
July 10, 2026

July Newsletter: The Legacy of the Declaration of Independence Belongs to We the People

Rule of Law
July 7, 2026

CAC Release: DOJ Under Todd Blanche Fails to Disclose Epstein Files (Again)

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the Trump administration’s failure to disclose the Epstein files...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 4, 2026

Why Would President Trump Want to Celebrate the Declaration of Independence?

Common Dreams
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes wrote an op-ed for Common Dreams explaining the similarities between...
By: Praveen Fernandes