Civil and Human Rights

Justices Reject Qualified Immunity Reform

…In her taser dissent, Sotomayor wrote that the officers elected to use force knowing that it would directly cause the very outcome they claimed to have sought to avoid. “This court’s precedent establishes that ‘the ‘reasonableness’ of a particular seizure depends not only on when it is made, but also on how it is carried out. Using deadly force that does no more than knowingly effectuate the exact danger to be forestalled is clearly unreasonable under this standard.”

In her dissent in the suicide case, she wrote that the jailers were deliberately indifferent to the risks to which they subjected the suicidal inmate.

[Hogan Lovells partner Cate] Stetson has been in the effort to persuade the justices to reform the qualified immunity doctrine for some time. In the petitions just denied, which had been distributed for the justices’ private conferences more than a dozen times, she received support from other legal groups seeking reform of the doctrine, such as the Constitutional Accountability Center, the libertarian Cato Institute and the Institute for Justice….

For more, visit the National Law Journal at

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
August 7, 2022

In Harvard admissions case, will justices cherry-pick their history?

Washington Post
If you thought the Supreme Court term that just concluded was a disaster, brace yourself...
Civil and Human Rights
August 1, 2022

Originalism Watch: Fauxriginalist Opponents of Affirmative Action Bring Their Case to SCOTUS

Today, Constitutional Accountability Center filed a brief in support of the University of North Carolina...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina

In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, the Supreme Court is considering whether it is permissible for public and private institutions of higher education...
Civil and Human Rights
July 21, 2022

BLOG: Fight to Abolish Slavery Continues in Congress and Federal Court

When most people hear that Congress is currently considering a constitutional amendment to abolish slavery...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Civil and Human Rights
July 14, 2022

Prison Labor Rights in Focus as 3rd Cir. Hears $5-a-Day Pay Case

Bloomberg Law
A federal appeals court in Philadelphia will hear oral argument Thursday over whether to revive...
Civil and Human Rights
July 5, 2022

Patrick Lyoya’s Death Casts A Light On How Police Mishandle Traffic Stops

On April 4, a police officer shot Patrick Lyoya at point-blank range in the back...
By: David H. Gans, By Phillip Jackson